Real Alpha
Try Pro free

a16z Podcast · 3 min · Mar 20, 2026

AI should equip sales teams to win rather than replace them

Shyam Sankar argues AI should make a sales team more capable, not simply reduce its headcount. He frames adoption around winning and amplifying the strongest people.

Shyam Sankar

Shyam Sankar is chief technology officer at Palantir Technologies.

Runs Palantir's technology as CTO, having joined as employee 13 and pioneered the forward-deployed engineering model.

  • Erik Torenberg, Host · General partner, Andreessen Horowitz

    Helped build Product Hunt; founded On Deck, Village Global and Turpentine.

About this segment

Shyam Sankar argues AI should make a sales team more capable, not simply reduce its headcount. He frames adoption around winning and amplifying the strongest people.

From “Palantir CTO on The SaaS Apocalypse & Preventing The Next World War | a16z”, Mar 20, 2026. Watch the full episode

Answers “Which jobs will AI replace, and which are safe?” See all 102 answers

Answers “Will AI replace customer service jobs?” See all 6 answers

“I'm not sure why the goal is replacing people to begin with. Like, isn't the goal to win?”
Shyam Sankarat 36:38 · a16z Podcast36:38

Takeaways

  1. Start with the goal of winning, not replacing workers.
  2. Use AI to systematize and amplify top performers.
  3. A mixed human-AI team can be more valuable than automation alone.

In this episode

Full episode
  1. 24:11AI will pressure generic software and reward distinctive toolsPro pick 3:31
  2. 6:07Civilian industry once helped build America's arsenalPro pick 5:27
  3. 29:30AI's economic impact depends on how people choose to wield it3:58
  4. 13:46Colonel Cukor's AI effort shows why heretics need protection4:12
  5. 20:53Army operators can turn domain expertise into software in weeks2:54

  6. 35:43AI should equip sales teams to win rather than replace them2:49

  7. 38:13America's central risk is losing the will to address its problems2:29Up next
  8. 49:43Rickover's long tenure helped build an unusually safe nuclear navy3:45

Transcript

Transcribed by machine (Whisper) from the episode’s audio, so a word may be off here and there.

  1. 35:55

    One thing one of our portfolio CEOs said is that maybe salespeople are the least AI-able in terms of being able to be automated or replace them. I'm curious how you think about sort of the jobs that tech companies leverage with AI, how you're using in Palantir. How do you think about that? Yeah, so one part I was I was going to say from earlier that I think is relevant to this is, you know, Pascal said, every human has a God-shaped hole in their heart.

  2. 36:27

    And part of the potential pathology from the labs is that they have filled that hole with AGI. And so there are things that they assert as empirical that are actually articles of faith. They may be true, they may not be true. I don't know, but they get confused between what's an article of faith and what is actually an empirical reality. And so if you view this through a very pragmatic, clear-eyed view, say the salespeople, I'm not sure why the goal is replacing people to begin with.

  3. 36:53

    Like, isn't the goal to win? Isn't the goal to be dominant in your industry? You want to be better. And so maybe being better is about a mixed mammal AI team. It's, you know, how do I build the Ironman suit for the salespeople I do have? How do I make the best salespeople more productive and systematized? What is it that makes them good for everyone else? Like, there's all sorts of other ways of thinking about the problem if your goal is winning.

  4. 37:16

    But if your goal is AGI, it's the aesthetic of the fact that you couldn't replace the person with this model is offensive. And you're just going to, you know, you're just going to keep driving at that. And I think it could be a distraction. This is one way in which I think the Chinese do have a little bit of an advantage, which is, first of all, just to be clear, I'd bet on us, you know, 100 times out of 100.

  5. 37:37

    But they have a pragmatic approach, like the whole point of AI is to win. It's not AGI. It's how do I improve my productive forces, as they would call it. Now, I think that the good news is if you look at the people who wield the technology in America, that's what they're focused on. You know, the CEOs I deal with, none of them have asked me, hey, I want to fire a bunch of people or how do I get rid of these people?

  6. 38:03

    Maybe because we're too expensive for that sort of bullshit use case, but they come to me and say, I want to dominate my industry. Like, I want to destroy my competition. Okay, great. So the ambition is there and maybe you get more efficient by doing it, but actually the whole point is to grow massively. So that ambition sets the frame of how you're going to apply the technology and what sort of solutions you find valuable.