The alpha, twice a week
That was 2 min.
Get the best new moments in your inbox every Wednesday and Saturday. It's free.
Check your inbox
We sent a link to your address. Click it to finish signing up. Not there in a minute? Look in spam.
or
Sourcery · 2 min · Oct 31, 2026
Orbital data centers get cheaper below $500 per kilo
Philip Johnston
Philip Johnston compares space solar power with terrestrial data centers and says launch cost is the deciding factor.
The episode’s best minutes
Full episode- 31:37Orbital data centers get cheaper below $500 per kilo2 min
- 33:42Chip failures could make or break orbital data center economics4 min
- 2:53Starcloud repaired a broken vibration table in one weekend4 min
- 3 more moments in the full episode
“in space number one we don't need permitted land so your biggest cost is gone we don't need batteries and backup power because they're 24-7 in the Sun”
Philip Johnstonat 32:37 · Sourcery
Takeaways
- No permitted land or battery backup is needed in orbit.
- Space solar panels produce about eight times more energy per area.
- Below roughly $500 per kilo, orbital infrastructure can be cheaper.
About this segment
Philip Johnston compares space solar power with terrestrial data centers and says launch cost is the deciding factor. His estimate gives a concrete threshold for when orbital compute can compete.
Co-Founder & CEO, Starcloud
Building Starcloud’s space-based data centers to scale AI compute beyond terrestrial constraints.
Molly O'Shea, Host · Founder, Sourcery
Ex-Upfront Ventures investor; has interviewed Alex Karp and Palmer Luckey.
From “Nvidia GPUs in Orbit: Inside Starcloud’s $2B Factory”, Oct 31, 2026. Watch the full episode
Thanks. We'll look at and fix what's off.
Transcript
Transcribed by machine (Whisper) from the episode’s audio, so a word may be off here and there.
- 31:47
and I know we talked about this with Addy, is the economics of this. You are making more economical satellites going out in space and the vehicle itself and so that's one thing and so I'd love. break that down in the economics there and then also further drill down the difference between on land like terrestrial data centers versus orbital yeah um so the whole thing is actually contingent on the launch cost um so if the launch cost gets below around 500 a kilo then it will be much cheaper to do this in space than terrestrially and i think a sort of good comparison for this is if you build a new solar project on earth to power a data center because solar is kind of the cheapest form of energy we have terrestrially and so the way you can think about it is solar terrestrially has these three big costs the biggest cost is the cost of permitted land
- 32:39
depending where you are second biggest cost is the cost of batteries storage and backup power and then the last cost is the cost of the solar cells themselves and so in space number one we don't need permitted land so your biggest cost is gone we don't need batteries and backup power because they're 24-7 in the Sun and then we need eight times less solar cells because one square meter of solar panel in space produces about eight times the energy of one in space. So we have all these savings in space. The main additional cost we have is the launch cost and so that's where this trade-off comes and that's where we see when you run those numbers you come out to about $500 a kilo where it makes more sense to do in space than terrestrially. And of course right now with Starship we're at about $5,000 a kilo, sorry with Falcon 9
- 33:22
the design of starship is designed to produce launch costs of uh internal launch costs for spacex of sort of 20 to 20 to 40 dollars a kilo um so so long as they pass that launch cost through to us at anything less than say 10 times their marginal launch cost or even more uh whether that makes sense for us um right now by the way in falcon 9 they charge two or three times their marginal launch cost so it seems reasonable yeah another thing that i listened to so i listened to