The alpha, twice a week
That was 3 min.
Get the best new moments in your inbox every Wednesday and Saturday. It's free.
Check your inbox
We sent a link to your address. Click it to finish signing up. Not there in a minute? Look in spam.
or
80,000 Hours Podcast · 3 min · Nov 5, 2026
The State Department initially resisted AGI and loss-of-control language
Jeremie Harris says Biden-era officials resisted AGI and loss-of-control language in a State Department report.
In this episode
Full episode- 43:21AI capability has a scaling curve, but alignment does not7 min
- 1:13:32A severe AI incident could force Washington to seek a slowdown8 min
- 22:49Harris says early funders discouraged government outreach7 min
- 1:57:57Alignment progress could weaken incentives to honor an AI deal6 min
- 1:28:22An AI crisis could start with limits on visible compute assets6 min
- 50:25Harris says OpenAI's safety-minded staff gradually left6 min
- 1:51:28Verification technology could make AI agreements more detailed7 min
- 3:47The State Department initially resisted AGI and loss-of-control language3 min
“the administration at that time, it was Biden, did not want terms like AGI to be used in this thing, because it seemed like science fiction”
Jeremie Harrisat 4:37 · 80,000 Hours PodcastTakeaways
- Officials objected to AGI and loss-of-control terminology.
- Harris says his team fought to include both concepts in the report.
- A lab employee urged more ambitious recommendations in 2023.
About this segment
Jeremie Harris says Biden-era officials resisted AGI and loss-of-control language in a State Department report. He describes pushing to include the terms and one lab employee urging stronger recommendations.
Jeremie Harris is CEO and cofounder of Gladstone AI; cohost of Last Week in AI.
Created a leading course on AI in national security and briefed senior government officials on AI risk.
- RW
Robert Wright, Host · NonZero
From “What happens on the day the president fears AI will kill him? | Jeremie Harris (x-post from NonZero)”, Nov 5, 2026. Watch the full episode
Thanks. We'll look at and fix what's off.
Transcript
Transcribed by machine (Whisper) from the episode’s audio, so a word may be off here and there.
- 3:59
research that started in 2023. Actually, the report itself was commissioned by the State Department about a month before chat GPT, before the eye of Sauron was on this issue. Like nobody in the US government was paying attention to it, which meant that there was no pressure to bureaucratize, let's say, the output of the work, the report itself. And so that's really the only reason that we were able to go public with it when we did. And so there was this really funny situation that unfolded where, you know, basically we're, we're revealed to be working on this thing that suddenly became of massive public interest in the immediate aftermath of chat GPT.
- 4:38
But it's too late for the government to like, there's no take backs. And so, you know, off we go writing this report that the government now knows will one day be public. And there's all this like kind of political back and forth. Because the administration at that time, it was Biden, did not want terms like AGI to be used in this thing, because it seemed like science fiction, They didn't want terms like loss of control to be included. And so we had like a pretty intense political fight behind the scenes to make those things appear in the report. We felt it was essential just because, as you know, I mean, Silicon Valley has been talking openly about artificial general intelligence and superintelligence as being the end goal of what they're doing. It's like the, I wouldn't even call it the worst kept secret in Silicon Valley. It is
- 5:19
the open and stated primary objective of the world's most valuable companies at this point, or many of them. And so anyway, so we just wanted that to, yeah, become public. You know, I think one of the things in retrospect that it kicked off was it was, to my understanding, the first time that there were published in kind of mainstream outlets, sort of insider whistleblower reports from the Frontier Labs themselves. And at that time, it was a lot riskier. Like we had people who had, like one guy, you know, took me aside after a meeting at one of the Frontier Lab headquarters. And he just like gave me his phone and his hand was shaking. He was like, Hey, can you put your number in my phone? Like, and what he told me at the time actually was, um, whatever your recommendations in this report are going to be, I would urge you to please be more ambitious.
- 6:09
And later on, we met him like literally at a, at a bar offsite, just to kind of like get the rundown of what he meant by that. And he was talking about nationalizing the frontier labs. Like this was 2023. He was saying, you know, we're getting there. Right. So I think this kind of crazy world the sort of almost science fiction scenarios or what seemed like science fiction then is now starting to just become mundane reality like the overton windows shifted so much that you know i think it's time to reassess a lot of these a lot of these proposals yeah let me uh