Try Pro free

How I Invest · 4 min · Oct 26, 2026

Anthropic's growth could support its reported $2 trillion valuation

Matthew Harris says Anthropic's reported growth makes the valuation reasonable if momentum continues.

The episode’s best minutes

Full analysis
  1. 1:58Valuation discipline can make venture firms miss power-law winnersPro pick 5 min
  2. 17:35AI labs may avoid competing with their biggest customers6 min
  3. 32:44Anthropic's growth could support its reported $2 trillion valuation4 min
  4. 5 more moments in the full episode
Up next · The Real Eisman PlaybookAI financing echoes the warehouse lines behind subprime3:34
“If that growth rate can continue or anything like it can continue, they will grow into and through that valuation in a very reasonable period of time.”
MHMatthew Harrisat 33:37 · How I Invest
33:37

Takeaways

  1. Fast growth can make a seemingly high valuation look reasonable later.
  2. Shareholder demand for liquidity could add pressure after lockups expire.
  3. A large potential sell-off would require substantial new buyers.

About this segment

Matthew Harris says Anthropic's reported growth makes the valuation reasonable if momentum continues. He flags a separate uncertainty: how much shareholders may sell when lockups expire.

MH

Matthew Harris

Matthew Harris is a Partner at Bain Capital Ventures focused on financial services and technology.

From “Anthropic at $2 Trillion? The AI Bubble, and Why the Best Startups Always Look Overvalued”, Oct 26, 2026. Watch the full episode

Answers “Is AI a bubble?” See all 30 answers

Transcript

From the transcript How I Invest publishes with the episode.

  1. 32:56

    unfiltered unfiltered opinion, but let's assume that goes public at reported $2,000,000,000,000. I don't have any insider information on that. How do you think about the valuation, and what will be the drivers on whether that's overvalued or undervalued? I think the valuation based on the reported revenue numbers and revenue growth is actually reasonable. You know, these are unprecedented. Is that just because the sticker shock on $2,000,000,000,000 is just so great they had to price it like that?

  2. 33:31

    To be clear, there is sticker shock about 2,000,000,000,000. But I think if you look at the underlying business momentum, other than the sticker shock of that being a kind of an unprecedented number, It's actually reasonable. Like if you took three zeros off of all the numbers, you would say, well, actually, that makes sense. If that growth rate can continue or anything like it can continue, they will grow into and through that valuation in a very reasonable period of time.

  3. 33:59

    So I don't think it's unreasonable at all. You know, we have a hard time as investors pricing companies that are in hyper growth because it's really hard to do any kind of forward. Goes back to where we were talking before. Correct. Seems overvalued. It might see overvalued at a moment. But again, if hypergrowth continues, it'll quickly seem undervalued. So I think we just you know, we just don't know.

  4. 34:20

    And so I don't think it's unreasonable. And I am sure there's demand. I think what will be interesting to see technically is how much of the cap table is in strong hands versus weak hands. And therefore, what the supply demand picture looks like when the lockups start to come unlocked. You know, SpaceX has done well so far. But I just don't know enough about the detail of the anthropic cap table to know how many, you know, venture firms and other investors who haven't produced a lot of liquidity in the last, you know, five years are really eager to produce some liquidity.

  5. 35:00

    Another set of incentives. And as a small shareholder, not not so small outcome, I I could see if you invested 50,000,000 or a 100,000,000, that number is very difficult to walk away from even if you think it's undervalued. Yeah. I think that... And you're the LP and you're sort of saying, alright. It's a lot of TVPI, but we haven't had distributions from this asset class. So let's get going with this.

  6. 35:25

    And this is how this works. You give us money back and we give it back to you, but you need to give it back. So again, that doesn't make me pessimistic. I just don't know the math around this week. It's more of a short term volatility. Correct. But these things can have a... Actually, I'd say medium term effect if you have a cap table full of weekends that need liquidity, particularly when the numbers get that big.

  7. 35:48

    Because how do you replace, you know, in a theoretical, say you had half of the company were liquidity seeking owners in a period of two years, you know, between IPO and two years after IPO. That means you got to go. If the stock stays flat, you got to go source another trillion dollars of liquidity. That's not just a valuation question. That's just a like cash. Where's that coming from? Probably not coming from T bills.

  8. 36:14

    So it's coming from somewhere. So there's some like physics of the market that but by the way, that 50% was like total speculation. I'm I have no no intuition that half the cap table is a seller in the first two years. But, you know, we're an unprecedented territory, and so we just don't... We don't really know.