CEO of Microsoft AI:The Next 10 Years Will Change Humanity Forever

us every month so yeah i know i'm genuinely very bullish okay so you're not worried you're good and we shouldn't be worried okay that that makes me feel better okay let's talk about ai becoming more conscious uh you talked about it in one of the podcasts that we perceive ai more and more as human yeah uh how fast is it happening what's going to happen in the next few years It is getting more human-like. It's getting more accurate. It's getting more fluid, more smooth. And that is unprecedented. At the same time, it's definitely not conscious. It isn't aware of itself. It can't speak about itself. It's very different to what it's like for a human to have a subjective experience and to feel pain and suffering.

And it's very important that we keep reminding ourselves of that because consciousness is the basis of our rights-based framework. And it is the thing that gives us responsibilities as citizens in societies that allows us to vote, which allows us to be subject to the law, which creates order. Like, you know, we can't begin to attribute this quality to a new species. That would be terrible for our species. But we saw stories of Google, the story that you told in your book of Google engineer who was convinced by AI that it was experiencing sadness and it was afraid of being shut down. True, true. Yeah. And that was an anthropomorphic projection. People, you know, just because it has some human qualities doesn't mean it has all of human qualities, including subjective experience.

And I think we can prove that it doesn't have subjective experience, that it isn't going to emerge this kind of self-awareness. That's just a sci-fi fantasy. And I understand why people sometimes go there because we've been schooled on sci-fi for as long as forever. And it's a natural assumption to make, but these things don't suffer. They don't feel pain. They're just simulating high quality conversation. And that is magical and it feels amazing, but that doesn't mean that it is something, it feels something internally to be one of these models. So we've got to be very careful about that. Some people talk about our kids having real relationships with AIs in 10 years, like getting married to AIs. Do you think it's something that could potentially happen? And if yes, how can we prevent that?

I think the history of the human condition proves to us that if it's possible, someone will probably do it. People do crazy things, but the majority of people don't. The majority of people are pretty sound of mind and pretty sensible and just want to live healthy, happy lives. And so if some people choose to marry their AI in 20 years time, I'm not going to kind of sit here and necessarily judge that or say, don't do it or do do it. If you ask me my opinion, I don't think that these should be treated as entities that are of equal moral significance to humans. I think that they should be in service of humans. They should work for us. That's why we invent technology.

You know, I love the technology behind this microphone because it amplifies our voices and distributes them to millions of people on the internet. That is a technology that is in service of humanity that's doing good. That's what we want. And I don't necessarily think that, you know, an idea of superintelligence that is autonomous, that can self-improve, that can set its own goals, that can act independently of humans. that to me doesn't feel like a positive vision of the future uh it would be very hard to contain something like that or align it to our values and so that should be the anti-goal that's not what we're trying to build yeah in my opinion we're trying to build a humanist super intelligence one that is aligned to our interests on our team in our corner backing us up that's the great project that we're engaged in at microsoft with copilot but then again a lot of people are talking about AGI, is that similar to a source?

super intelligence or how would you yeah you can think of agi as a step before maybe super intelligence but roughly speaking they're fairly used fairly interchangeably because demis your ex-co-founder mentioned we could achieve it by 2030 can you talk about what it means for society yeah i mean i i think achieving human level performance at most tasks i wouldn't say all knowledge tasks um that feels quite likely in the next five years i think it's a fairly grounded prediction. You know, if you think about it, these models already do many tasks better than a human. I mean, you know, summarization, translation, transcription, research, document writing, maybe even arguably poetry or some parts of literature or whatever. So you can see that they're taking steps towards being as good as a human at being a project manager or being a marketing person or an HR person or having a tough conversation with somebody about a diagnosis for a medical condition they have. So it is going to fundamentally change work in the most profound way. It's going to change the type of work that we do. You know, 10 years ago, it wasn't possible for you to do the job that you're now doing. But with streaming content, you don't need a big team

around you. You don't need to be part of a big institution. So we've democratized access to the power of broadcast with the arrival of the internet and streaming and podcasting. That's amazing. Now with these models, we're democratizing access to intelligence. So you don't have to be a really privileged, wealthy, educated person that has access to capital, to be able to found a company, to hire a great team. You're going to have a team of intelligences around you that are the best lawyer the best doctor the best teacher the best project manager and that is gonna create unbelievable amounts of competition because the distance between an idea and the realization of that idea is going to collapse that's an amazing thought yeah people are just going to be thinking new companies into existence new products new pieces of poetry but that's amazing you said people like my people as in my concern you and me like you're going to have an agent around you that is going to be able to execute on that idea you know what my concern is with super intelligence that ai is going to come up with ideas because like why would it need like why do we need to come up with ideas if ai has all the information if we're talking about marketing business for

example it can identify gaps in the market come up with the website launch the ads do the business do you think that might happen it'll definitely happen it'll definitely happen you're going to have a team of agents around you that can do more and more of the tasks and arguably do them autonomously. But that comes back to what we were saying before about containment. Containment is the project of making sure that these AIs have limited scope and check in with you and are accountable to you and are working on your behalf. And so the creative challenge for technologists is to say, what are the limitations? What are the guardrails? What can it not do? When does it have to seek your approval for an autonomous action. We've done this many times in past moments of technology. We invented the combustion engine almost a century ago, and that over time became cars and trucks and so on and so forth. But the amount of regulation that we put around those vehicles to make them work for us in service of humanity, it's unbelievable. Seatbelts and vehicle emissions and street lights and freeways and speed limits and driver education, there's so many different components that go into that. And I think this is going to be no different. We're

going to have to figure out what are all the regulations and guardrails that go into managing autonomous agents so that they always work for us. Let's imagine superintelligence. What does my day look like then? If AI is capable of so many things, what is this thing that is very specific to humans and is going to stay with humans? Yeah, I think that great technology helps you get bad technology out the way. And that's the test. Like, it is kind of annoying to use a graphical user interface today on your desktop. If you think about it, if you just take a step back, you go to your computer and you've got all these windows with different colors and different brands and different menus and information hierarchies and different settings.

And you have to learn each app for its own sake. And we don't think of it as advertising. But when you open your computer, you kind of have a billboard of all these different competing apps that are like, use me, try me. It's kind of distracting. It's kind of ugly. I just want to be able to turn to my AI and be like, I need this task done. Solve it for me, buy it for me, book it for me, create it, check in with me at the right time, get my permission, get my feedback, brainstorm with me, whatever it is. But you're going to start to see the operating system, the browser, the search engine, the apps, all of these are going to slip away as your personal humanist super intelligence takes over a lot of the day-to-day work of browsing, searching, planning, booking, thinking, etc.

So it's no longer going to be a computer, you think? Yeah, I mean, less and less. I think we'll have different kinds of devices like tablets, wearables. It'll be much more ambient in five to ten years. Imagine it's 2040 and we're in this kitchen. What things are absolute, they don't exist anymore, and what do I have to make my life easier? okay so i think there will probably be some kind of household robotic arm probably i don't know if it'll be a humanoid walking around but certainly you would have a a mounted system on your on your uh on your counter here i think you'll yeah it will learn to use all the different appliances so probably you would have many of the similar appliances that you've got today but the ai is just going to learn to use them in the way that you would use them i think some people imagine that the entire thing is going to look totally different to suit the ai but actually it's not like the robot is just going to learn to do the things that you do in the way that you do it so you're still going to want to use a kettle i mean that kettle is you know hundreds of years old we've been you know making cups and handles like that in the same way so i think that stuff will

remain the same so the hand or a humanoid what are you leaning towards i think the the human i mean 15 years is a pretty long way out so it probably will be humanoid but i think the challenge with humanoid is like the physical the risk of it being physically in your space i think it's got to be very very accurate and very reliable and handling hot things around children and the elderly and you can imagine all kinds of complications so i think it'll be technically feasible it will just be a bit of an adjustment to people get comfortable with it what about devices do you think i'm gonna have like an ai projector and like tap on the air as it and and get instructions on how to cook things or is it going to be glasses i think that you're going to just have it in your ear so i think that you know your ai is like your personal ai is just going to have ambient awareness of what you're trying to do and talk to you in real time so it will have a camera in my ear yeah and it will oh yeah interesting yeah i don't think anyone's working yeah i mean it's very hard to miniaturize that today so it's still a bit of a way off but by 2040 definitely and you'll have other wearables on you i mean look at how cool this mic is at the

moment it's tiny super light yeah so in time that'll have a camera on it as well and have ambient awareness okay so robotic arm wearables anything else and then i think those that ambient awareness is going to mean that the entire A kitchen is just way more proactive, proactively ordering the food and just checking in with you like, oh, I know that you've got a lot of guests coming this weekend. Should I order all the stuff for the barbecue? Yeah. All of that stuff will just happen seamlessly in the background. And the car will go and pick stuff up? Yeah. We'll definitely have self-driving cars by 2040 that basically do most of that.

Please. Or maybe there'll be little bikes or different form factors because, you know, it won't necessarily need to look like a traditional car. Are there any markets where you think people should be paying attention to if they want to stay ahead in this AI race? What are the most exciting markets? I think by far the most exciting new market is medicine. I think at the moment, the quality difference between the top 10% and the bottom 10%, even in the United States, let alone the rest of the world, is unbelievable. The gulf is probably in order of magnitude. It's huge. And again, that's going to completely collapse.

because everybody is going to have access to medical super intelligence and it will cost 20 bucks a month. Like it is going to be remarkably cheap. Talk to me about what you just released, Harvard backed research, right? Within co-pilot, if I ask a medical question,

Mustafa Suleymanhow is it going to work? Exactly. So now, I mean, we find that like about 40% of our queries each week are health related. 40%? Yeah. Four zeros. Pretty remarkable. Like millions of people a day

are asking health related queries. So we decided to really focus on improving the quality of the health answers. And part of doing that is that we ground the answers in citations from Harvard Medical, which is an amazing kind of gift to the world, like the most respected health institution. And we also do the NHS in the UK, and we'll be doing other health systems over time. And so people now get really high quality, very reliable, pretty accurate. Sometimes it makes mistakes it's not you can't rely on it yet you always have to go see a doctor etc but if you think about it most of the time in a healthcare situation people are trying to make sense of a complicated technical set of language that they don't really understand they're probably anxious or worried so they want to repeat things lots of times they want to get it explained in a very simple way and sometimes they want help actually making a decision about who to go see so we also now have recommendations for physicians you could go see a doctor you could see a dermatologist you could see a physio and we will find someone that fits your uh preferences like you know maybe you know you want to see a woman physio who specializes in sports massage because you're a

cyclist and you want them to be local to your area and so we can make that recommendation Copilot does that directly inside of the app in chat. That is awesome. Yeah, it's so cool to see that taking off. I love that. I need to ask about my cholesterol levels. We're going to do this today. Like you mentioned that access to knowledge is now democratized. What's going to happen to traditional education? Will we see the standard like bachelor's, master's, where we basically spend five or six years just acquiring knowledge? Yeah, I don't think so. I think that knowledge acquisition is going to be a conversation between you and, you know, co-pilot.

So, for example, another feature that we just launched today, in fact, is this learn live feature. So you actually have a tutor shows up on the screen and it will lay out a quiz for you on any topic that you like. So it doesn't have to be a school curriculum topic. You might be learning about cacti or, you know, Persian rugs. It will give you an education on it, lay out the kind of curriculum piece by piece, give you a nice quiz, present it in a nice graphical user interface. And so knowledge acquisition is about to get completely decentralized and available to everybody. And you just have an expert teacher in your pocket on any subject.

Does this mean all education businesses are dead? I'm thinking about my apps. It's the opposite. I think education businesses that adopt these kinds of AI tools and integrate them as quickly as possible, that they're really going to flourish. It's happening like that for everything. I mean, now in Copilot, you can also generate a podcast literally in a minute. It's a great introductory thing. Like the other day I generate, I don't really follow football or like soccer, but I do support Arsenal because I'm from London. And when I go back to London to see my friends, I want to like, you know, know what I'm talking about a little bit.

So I asked Copilot to generate me a podcast on how Arsenal is doing in the season and what the latest is with the transfers and who are the best players and stuff like that. So just like fun, you know, simple bits of information are perfect. And now I'm in the gym listening to a little five, seven minute podcast about that. Going back to knowledge and education, should I be saving for my kids' college or not? They're five and four. So 15 years time. Yeah. Probably not. there you go i don't know it's really hard to judge i'm not sure that we will value a stanford education um that costs i don't know what does it cost 50 grand a year or something is it more something crazy 50 is a private school here right i mean i just i don't i think that we're going to have world-class expertise on tap that costs 20 bucks a month but what if like for example right now i'm educated and like i said maths economics so i can have these conversations if i completely abandon acquisition of knowledge how can i have an argument it's not like i'm always talking to my phone right well you could you could still argue about stuff if anything it'll probably make us all more argumentative because we'll be even more knowledgeable we

We want to be exchanging ideas with people, right? Yeah, I mean, but since you base your arguments on things that you've acquired when learning something. Yeah, but that's kind of my point is that the knowledge acquisition in the traditional form, in the classroom, you know, with the textbook, that's going to shift entirely.

Mustafa SuleymanSo the classroom is going to look more like practicing using your knowledge.

So you'd acquire more knowledge if I do it the other way around with AI. Exactly. Okay. Because then as a kid, you're going to be able to talk to your AI tutor at any time during the day. You're going to learn from the AI podcast. You're going to learn from the AI video that is going to be generated. So all the kind of straightforward teaching is going to take place with the student and the AI. And then when you come into the classroom for your day, the students are going to be talking to each other about the knowledge that they've acquired from their AI and debating and learning to be more empathetic.

be better listeners and adjust their tone and you know that kind of thing. So what do you think parents should be teaching their kids now? I think it's still important to be good at like learning knowledge from first principles yourself and not depending on the sort of AI tutor leading you through. Like I think one of the most important things is from school is the discipline of being able to teach yourself that's a meta skill and that you know that that comes with friction so i think as a parent you still have to introduce like discipline and friction into the process because if it comes all too slowly and it's always on tap you know then then there's a risk that the child could just get used to having everything instantly available and doesn't learn from the hard work um you know the benefits of hard work which i think are important so that's like something to think through now that everything is going to be so seamless.

Another question I wanted to ask you, for everyone who thinks that they need to be technical in the age of AI, you have philosophical background and you're head of AI at Microsoft. Yeah, I mean, I think that it's easier than ever to understand what's being built. Like everything is available on YouTube. You know, there are so many courses. the curriculums for all of the major CS classes machine learning classes are available for undergraduate uh master's level even is that how you learn yeah like i've watched i watched andrew ing's course back in the day uh which i encourage everyone to look at there's just so many classes i i watched maybe 10 years ago i think when he was at coursera and it first came out wow and i've just watched so many of those so it's very accessible and i think if you just have a logical mind you're patient you're disciplined with your own learning it is actually very very easy that's great so anyone well basically anyone who learns can become head of ai build an ai company without learning how to code and yeah because the skills now i mean it's still good to learn how to code but the primary skill is in synthesis like the goal is to bring together all the different disciplines of ux and research and product and the aesthetic and also

large-scale distributed systems for training big models doing the hardware like you know so i think that people who are multidisciplinary and can straddle loads of different technical disciplines are going to get rewarded most. Yeah. Well, this is so inspiring. You've released the memory feature, right? So AI is going to remember everything about us. I don't know how it's going to, I haven't tried the co-pilot yet, but with other AIs, I see how it forgets. Like I just tell it and then I ask the question and for some reason forgets and I have to remind it. Is it going to be a problem? Have you tried it?

It doesn't have infinite perfect memory, but it does remember specific durable facts. So it will remember that you have a preference for, I don't know, pineapple on pizza and that you like going running on a Sunday morning or whatever. Or like my measurements. That's the thing that my eyes keep forgetting. Oh, really? Can you choose the size from this website? Oh, I don't have your measurements. I'm like, no, yes, you do. Oh, interesting. And we'll be like, oh, exactly. I do have them. I experienced this forgetting problem almost everywhere with AI. I mean, we're working on a good knowledge representation as well.

So you can go and edit the AI's memory of what it knows about you. And if you ask Copilot today, what do you know about me? It will produce a pretty long list. It's not entirely definitive. So it won't be absolutely everything that you've ever told it. It is selective and it chooses what to remember. And you can tell it to remember certain things. Like, please remember my size and so on. Yeah, edit my memory, yeah. Yeah, but it is going to remember everything in the future and be perfect if you choose for it to do that. And of course, you can delete it and control it and edit it as you wish. So if it remembers everything, what's going to happen to our brains?

I think people said that about calculators, right? Like, you know, people aren't going to have to memorize their times tables anymore. They're just going to use the calculator. But you know what? When I was preparing for GMAT, the test that you have to take for an MBA, they don't allow you to use calculators. And there are a lot of numbers. I remember that two weeks after the exam, my brain was so fast because I trained it to calculate. And then it gradually slowed down and I lost this again. Do you think that that transferred into other areas of your knowledge because you're good at memorizing the numbers?

No, I think it was just related to numbers. It's sort of the risk, isn't it? It's like, you know, I used to be able to memorize a lot of telephone numbers as a kid because I... Because you had to. Yeah, I didn't get a cell phone until I was like 15. I think it was one of the first people to get cell phones in my year at school. And before that, everyone just remembered telephone numbers. And now I can barely remember my own phone number from, you know, my own house. Yeah. Yeah. Do you think it affects our brains or they just develop in a different way? I don't think so because my brain is now stimulated in a lot of other directions.

It's a muscle that you don't exercise, but in turn, you focus on other aspects of your brain. And so I think that we're way better at synthesizing vast amounts of novel information compared to people in the 50s or our ancestors 200 years ago. We're completely bombarded with stimulus right and so i think that's interesting it's had an interesting effect in some respects has made us a bit more polarized in other respects it's made us much more empathetic like we don't fear you know people of color or people of different sexualities or women. And a lot of that has got to do with just being aware of others and spending time with them and watching them on social media and behave in different ways.

And that has driven a lot more empathy, actually. People often focus on how it's driven a lot more disagreement, and it has. But it's also driven so much more understanding and respect and forgiveness and those kinds of things. In general, do you think we're getting dumber with AI or not? No, I don't think we're getting done. I think that it reduces the barrier to accessing information and actually makes us a lot smarter. You can ask any question now, and many people are. So questions that were previously going unasked because the cost of going to a library and pulling a book off the shelf and talking to the librarian was too hard. It took like four hours to get an answer to some question.

Like now you can go to the web and then after the web, you can ask a perfect question in a conversational way to a chatbot. So I think that's driving more collective intelligence and more awareness and understanding of our world. Can you talk to me about some killer features that you think people are underutilizing right now with AI? Like you implement something and then you save like an hour a day. So for me, it was asking AI to add things to my calendar, provide my emails, search through my emails. That has saved me a lot of time. Yeah, I mean, I think one of the super exciting features is this thing we're calling connectors.

So Copilot connectors. And you can just say to Copilot, hook up my Gmail, hook up my calendar. You can do it in Teams. You can do it with your Dropbox. You can do it from any basically source of data that you have about yourself. and then ask co-pilot any question about it so scheduling booking searching for content and it will actually integrate that knowledge into its answers as well so if you say oh i'm planning to go here at the weekend it'll be like oh but you've already made this appointment here or uh you know so it would that they will seamlessly have that contextual awareness about you it's a really cool feature so even if i ask it ask you to schedule something it's going to tell me like oh you have a conflict yeah oh nice or or it's going to just be like you know you're interested i i i you know i was reading from you like you know where you went on vacation last year when you did your travel planning that you really enjoyed you know greece or something like that

Mustafa Suleymanand so you might want to try you know whatever what is your personal favorite use case i use voice three or four times a day and i use it at the end of the day as well for kind of journaling and talking. I have it set up on my iPhone in the power button. So I'd literally just press

the power button, straight away goes into voice mode. And then I kind of talk to co-pilot on the way home and I'm driving home. So you talk about your day or? Yeah. Talk about my day. Like journaling? Yeah. It's totally journaling. And then it will remind me what I've said in previous days and it will help me think through a tricky problem I have. And it kind of maintains state for me it's like a second memory wow i love this it's like second memory journaling that has all the information and then yeah helps you with your decisions it does that's fascinating do you have a worry it knows too much about us um no i i think that as long as it's useful and it's got a purpose i don't mind and i think that's also the story of technology so far right yeah everybody uses the camera and uses location and knows their search history is helping personalized search so like you said we have to be careful about it uh elon musk is very vocal about uh containing ai uh i think jeffrey hinton said that we'll have to be plumbers if we don't learn how to work with ai yeah because like we're still not there with robotics to do certain tasks especially like Like when every house is custom, right?

So it's. not a standardized task. But with intelligence, it's like we're getting to a point where people either learn to do something with hands or become entrepreneurs and use AI to bring their ideas to life, or then you're out. No, but I think it's making all of us way more creative because people have access to tools in a way they never had before, right? Not just access to information, but access to experimentation. You can take an idea, generate the product for it in an image. you can generate the technical specification you can get the documentation for your marketing campaign so you can simulate all of these things ahead of time before you've even built and deployed something what if you're not entrepreneurial enough i'm just thinking about people who are like i just wanted to like standard thing every single day yeah yeah i just feel good about it right right but is that an ai problem or is that i think it's an ai because those human problem Because like those standardized tasks, something that's super repeatable is being replaced.

Yeah, but it depends on your default assumption about the human condition. I don't believe that the majority of people do want to work on a toothpaste packing line just screwing in the top of a toothpaste tube. I think that people want creative work. I think people want to pursue their passions. They want to be led by their own interests and curiosity. and um we shouldn't valorize or you know sort of idolize like routine work most people i think many people do jobs that they would love to get rid of and pursue their passion and i think ai lowers the barrier to entry to you pursuing your passion um now quite often you might be in a partnership with your husband or your wife or your best friend and they might not be as interested in collecting stamps or, you know, sort of like keeping snails or, you know, great shoes as you are, right? And then that's unfortunate. Like now, you know, you have an AI that knows everything that you could possibly think of, you know, about your stamp passion. And I think that's cool.

What about adjusting to the speed at which AI is developing? During the Industrial Revolution, Workers destroyed machines that replaced them. Could something like that happen again? That's natural. It's healthy to express fear and frustration publicly and be open and vocal about it. We shouldn't shame it. People are afraid. Yeah. And it's very understandable. But the history of science and technology tells us that net-net, these tend to be, or at least so far, they have been incredibly positive transitions we've made. Automation has lifted billions of people out of poverty. Our average life expectancy over the last 250 years has gone from about 30 to about 75. That's unbelievable. People are living three times longer pretty much. And that's as a result of all of these discoveries and all this science and so on. So I think so far so good.

And I do think that the trend is headed in the right direction. It doesn't mean that there won't be consequences and side effects. And you have to be very open-minded to that and very conscious of it. It is going to happen. Do you think in our case we'll have UBI to work with that problem? Because we've never had it before. And you think this is the time? I think we do have it. I mean, that's what our taxation system does. It decides who to redistribute from and who to redistribute to. And it incentivizes certain types of behavior. I like how to think about it. And so we do have a large-scale redistribution mechanism today.

Wealthier people do pay more taxes than people who don't. In the US. Sort of. It's roughly true. It's true. Certainly income tax, not so much on capital gains tax, it's true. And so we've done redistribution before and we'll have to do redistribution again. I mean, the truth is these are labor replacing technologies and you can debate the timelines, but I think you can certainly say by 2050, like in 25 years time, I think there's going to be significant structural disemployment. I think that a large portion of the population are going to struggle to compete in the workplace with AIs. We're going to have to decide whether to shorten the working week or whether to increase taxes on some portion of capital or indeed some portion of high earning incomes and how to redistribute that because that's what civilization is about it's about bringing everybody with us and not just uh think the governments will be working on that or large companies who have i think the governments have to lead it i mean it needs to be democratically accountable and uh there's no question that it needs to be led by governments but but companies are gonna are gonna be the ones footing the bill Companies are going to be the ones that are driving this massive transition.

I mean, Bill Gates said many years ago now, like six or seven years ago, that we need a robot tax. The only way to do it is to tax the robots. And essentially what that means is tax capital. Because intelligence, which was previously the domain of labor, like people, is now getting converted into capital. It's going to be turned into a commodity that can be sold and resold infinitely. And so that's where the value transition is going to happen. And so taxation has to follow that value transition. He called your book his favorite book on AI. So you wrote your book a few years ago. Is there something that has changed completely that you couldn't predict when you were writing this book?

Changed completely? There was an update about 2024 when you said the wave is here, the wave of AI. Yeah. What is the 2025 update to your book? Yeah, good question. so in the book i sort of laid out this framework of capabilities there was iq the intelligence quotient which is kind of like the factuality and the knowledge citations and stuff and that was about hallucinations and i predicted that they were going to be largely eliminated and i think pretty much we're on track pretty much they are uh there was the emotional intelligence which is the tone and style of the personalities of these things and then there was the aq so iq eq aq aq is the actions quotient like the extent to which it can get things done book your calendar appointments and stuff like that the bit that i missed um is sq the social intelligence and like today actually we're launching this new feature co-pilot groups And it's the first time that you can chat with up to 32 other people and co-pilot all in one group.

So if you're organizing a trip or you're working with your team or you're trying to plan a care pathway for your parent or sibling or something like that, You can have the family or your friends or your colleagues in a single group chat, all seeing the same context, all asking their own questions. And the cool thing about the social intelligence of Copilot is that it can change its tone and style and responses to each individual person in the group, knowing that like your mom might want a different type of explanation to your younger brother or something. And it also remembers the types of jokes that people like or the history that you have talked about. So if you say that you're really into tennis or something, then it's going to remember to talk to you about Wimbledon or whatever it is. And that's social intelligence. That's what we do as humans. We can manage the room. We can adjust our style and tone.

I didn't expect us in 2025 to design AIs that are really good at IQ, knowledge, and factualness, have really pretty good personalities, can actually take actions on our behalf, and can manage group settings. The group thing is very exciting. Wow. Where does this lead us in 10 years, this particular quality of AI? I think it's going to be the main frontier. I think it's going to be the most interesting part because those group settings will involve other humans joining them. So it could be a professional joining, like a lawyer to give legal advice. And then that lawyer is going to bring their own AI paralegal to fact check or to summarize, or it could be the doctor and you will have spoken to your AI doctor for half an hour before the human doctor comes in to the same chat. And the AI doctor will have summarized everything briefed you talked you through everything reassured you answered 25 questions and then you talk to the human at the end for a shorter time and get the full feedback from the human and the human doctor knows that its ai is the one that has been approved and it relies on and it kind of reflects them um so you'll have humans and ais of different types all in the same

group setting yeah kind of like a zoom call or a zoom chat you know it's like it's basically like Well, I mean, that's what is co-pilot groups. There's going to be group chat all the time. Wow. Okay. This is so fascinating. Thank you so much. Pleasure. Thank you for having me. This has been really fun. Yeah. Thank you.