Joe Rogan Experience #2521 - Aravind Srinivas

Arjuna was not Drona's son, but he was his model disciple. And so Drona passed on the secret of the Brahmastra to him. And Drona's son also wanted it. But because it was his son, he also passed on the secret to his son, even though the son wasn't as good as Arjuna. And during the war, Arjuna and Drona fought on the opposite sides. It's just, you know, circumstances. And his dad died, Ashwatthama's dad, the teacher, died in the war. And so the son got mad and, like, unleashed the Brahmastra. And Lord Krishna had to come and save the planet to not get that destruction force. How old is the Mahabharata?

Again, there's a lot of different opinions on this, so I don't actually know for sure. My understanding is at least 1,500 to 2,500 years old. Like 1,500 years ago is the minimum. 2,500 years ago is the maximum. so it happened in some period in that thousand year time frame between that and um there's still like it's still unclear if like a lot of it is just like you know being mythologized um and what actually happened was just a war between kins uh there were two groups of people the pandavas and the kauravas and um you know each side thought they were fighting for their own rights and justice But at the end of the day, you can crudely understand it as, like, essentially fight for the kingdom.

Basically, there was a previous generation and two brothers, and both the brothers had a bunch of kids. And those kids were warring to get the next in line. And that ended up being, like, a... Massive war, and a bunch of other allies fought on each side. And so many amazing weapons were used as part of the war. And a lot of these weapons are like, extremely, like, like, describe an extreme level of detail. That is pretty incredible. Like, there's a lot of detail around like, targeted weapons. So you could precisely identify a target and just shoot at that. And then... Does it explain like what the weapon is?

Yeah, so there's one weapon called the Divyastra, where you can just specifically target any particular person or group, and it would just automatically direct itself and do it, almost like a semi-autonomous weapon. And then Lord Krishna had this weapon called the Sudarshan Chakra. It's basically a discus. And then you can just release it, and it will go and specifically identify somebody and chop off their head and come back to your... Right? It sub-directs itself. So what I was amazed by is how interesting it is in terms of all the autonomy in the weapons, semi-autonomy or autonomy, where the weapons could just be directed at people or directed at a group of soldiers, and it would just go and do its job and come back to the wielder.

And there were so many different astras, Divyastra, Varunastra, Nagastra. So Ramasra is obviously the ultimate, the hydrogen bomb equivalent. And all of these are described in a lot of detail and who has access to it. And, of course, it's mythologized, so it's described as these arrows in the back of your shoulders. But you could understand it as somebody having just access to a lot of weapons. And then whoever was powerful would go capture and colonize and gain power. and essentially a fight between a group of cousins. That's the bottom line of that story. Now, if we think of history as this linear progression from caveman to us, and we hear about autonomous weapons that were written in the Mahabharata somewhere around 2,000 plus years ago, we go, well, mythology.

But if not, if there's been some sort of rise and fall of civilization, if there has been catastrophic, whatever it is, asteroid impacts, shifting of the poles whatever it is yeah it's caused great disasters you can imagine that these people are remembering a time where there was some sort of very advanced civilization and this is what they're describing like if you knew for a fact that there had been a great advanced technologically advanced civilization when we have evidence that they had some technology like the pyramids of giza and stuff like how did you do that i don't know there's some technology involved, right? But we don't have evidence of the technology. But if we did, if we knew for a fact, you would look at the Mahabharata and go, oh, this is history. They're just explaining it in a kind of crude contemporary way for the time, arrows, instead of, you know, semi-autonomous drones with exploding heads on them. I mean, that's what we have now. All those things that they're describing, hydrogen bomb, semi-autonomous and autonomous drones i mean they have they have autonomous fighter jets now like they don't need people anymore like this we're we're in that area right now so when you read about something like that

from the mahabaratha you go like okay what what was really going on this episode is brought to Yeah, I mean, that's always been my fascination with those epics and the level of detail with which they described all these weapons. And who had access, different levels of access, the status required to have access, and how it was used in the wars, different formations of the soldiers. They had all these crazy formation structures, like forming the army like a lotus, forming the army like a, you know, there's something called a chakra viva, like literally it has to have concentric circles. so you cannot like actually get into the innermost circle without going through the outer circles and then you can get killed by each of the flanks whenever you're trying to enter in and the secret of how to actually break into these viuhas viuhas means formations was only known to a few people and it's incredible like you could say okay like somebody had to be extremely skillful to have that sort of like visualizations and imaginations of describing a story like that and and obviously like talkeen has done an amazing job a lot of the rings you know and creating so much detail at the same time like a lot of it actually coming through

in real life in some form again not exactly the same weapons but similar style makes you wonder was there actually something around then and people have tried excavations in all these areas there's like two main areas in the mahabharata hasinapur was the name of the kingdom and people have done excavations around there and have like found some artifacts that might date back to those years but uh there are also some details that are described in the epics that don't quite align with reality for example all the men all the main warriors in in that era were described as like very tall very big um seven eight feet whatever you know i don't even no exact numbers. But studies by archaeologists also say that people who lived in those years in those regions were probably not more than six feet tall. So it's not clear exactly like what happened, what was correct, what was not correct. And, you know, we just have to keep probing more. But I find the idea fascinating to think of like what could have existed in sacred texts that was only partially communicated to the next generation and having a lot of like reinterpretations. Another thing that is very interesting to think about is Vedic math.

So basically Vedic math is like a branch of mathematics that, you know, some people in India are grown up learning. Like I read it myself too. And some people actually practice it just to be sharper at mental math for doing their exams, like GMAT and things like that, GRE. And it has like a line in the Vedas that says, oh, like one from the last digit, two from the first digit, whatever, you know, so many different ways of multiplying two different numbers, like 97 times 96. Oh, like subtract the last two digits, put it in the right, multiply the first digits, put it in the left. That's the result. And then you wonder like, oh, wait, the Rig Veda is so old, it's as old as, it's the oldest sacred text out there.

how is it describing computation that feels right very unreal like do they actually know or understand advanced forms of computation even back in those days and uh and how old is rig veda um i don't exactly know how old it is why don't we put that into perplexity yeah let's do that Let's find out. Yeah. Yeah. It is technically the oldest sacred text out there. And so what's interesting is I wonder how old the stories were by the time they were written down. Like how much of it is relayed person to person for years and years, just like the Bible, before it's ever actually written down. Scholars usually date the composition of the Rig Veda to about 1500 to 1200 BCE.

So its oldest layer is roughly 3,200, 3,700 years old today. Like, if there really was, like, every ancient culture has a story of a flood. Everyone, they all have an apocalyptic story. And Mahabharata had the same thing. Mahabharata had the same thing where there was a big, like, almost like a tsunami-like thing. I don't exactly know what it was called, but that was the collapse of Lord Krishna's kingdom, Dwaraka. After the war, a lot of people died, but some people survived. And even those who survived got wiped out by a calamity or like some kind of like a fight among themselves. And most of the people who participated in that era actually died.

Here it is. The primordial, how do you say it? Manu? Yeah. Manu flood, classic Hindu grape flood myth where the righteous king Manu is warned by a divine fish about an imminent deluge that will destroy humanity. He builds a boat, loads it with his family. It's like Noah and the ark. It's the same thing with seeds and animals, ties it to the horn of the god in fish form, which tows the boat to safety until the waters recede and the world is repopulated. They all have the same story. yeah that's what's really crazy there is a there is a concept in um hindu uh philosophy called the yugas i'm reading a book about it yeah yeah yeah so uh there's like different yugas and yugas are like thousands of years and the concept is that the yugas keep cycling around and so like uh we are in the kali yuga right now and before that it was a dvapra yuga that's when I'll see you next time.

Most of Mahabharata happened and before that there was a Treta Yuga where the Ramayana happened and before that there was another Yuga. What is next after Kali Yuga? No, there is nothing next after Kali Yuga. It goes back to the first one. I forget the name of the first Yuga. Because the interpretation that I'm reading is that we're not in Kali Yuga anymore and that Kali Yuga ended in the 1900s and Dwapar Yuga started then. No, no. We are in Kali Yuga right now. 100%. 100%. So why do people have different interpretations? Is that true? Yeah, there's like a guru interpretation. There's like one specific guru that has this interpretation that Kali Yuga ended in the 1900s and that we're moving on.

Interesting. Yeah, but I don't know who's right because it's an enormous cycle, right? The cycles of humanity. Yeah, thousands of years. Yeah. Thousands of years. And so, yeah. So these are the four Yugas. um and um so why do people have different interpretations what let me tell you the book i'm reading yeah uh see if this book is discredited young jamie it is um it's by a guy named uh david uh steinowitz stein stein metz david stein metz the book is called the yugas interesting yeah i mean the the problem is when someone's got their own interpretation or some guru's interpretation it doesn't totally align it's hard to know who's right and who's wrong yeah keys understanding our hidden past emerging energy age and enlightened future yeah so that go back up to that again so this is in the description see what it says that where it says in 1894 an Indian sage gave us an explanation not only for our hidden past but for the trends of today and for future enlightenment so there's like one guy's interpretation that this guy is going off of I guess the difference might be that he thinks the yoga cycle is 24,000 years whereas I think it's probably much longer than that yeah um four yugas together is four million three hundred twenty thousand

years you know it's really nutty yeah one of the really nutty things is um both in the ancient sumerian texts and in some of the ancient egyptian texts there's depictions before the flood of people who reigned for thousands of years as kings yeah and it's common it's not it's and it's also they're referenced multiple times in different scripts that are from different parts of uh what was sumera at the time yeah it's really weird because they take it as established history once it gets to a certain age once they get into like whatever the age is where they can verify that this person was the king for a certain period of time but it's all in the same text as people that reigned for 6 000 years yeah it's it's and then one even just wipes out the whole thing yeah and um i mean this is also somewhat like tangentially related to um um the fermi paradox you know like if you assume all these things are happening on earth itself that entire civilizations are getting wiped out um you and like we always wonder you you've explored this topic the most um and um where are the aliens right and um there are different arguments that like okay like the reason we haven't quite found that is because the great filter exists and uh there is like one entertaining

theory that um i like just for the sake of entertainment is um almost all civilizations end up advancing technologically a lot and either a calamity or, like, they built some misaligned AGI and then AGI wipes them out. And because of that, they never actually, like, end up being visible to us. Or the other theory is that, like, they're, like, we haven't quite built the Wein-Neumann probes to actually go find them. And both of them are plausible. And, you know, there's no clear way to, like, know. unless we actually like send out enough probes this episode is sponsored by better help we've come a long way with mental health but there's still work to be done better helps 2026 state of stigma report surveyed 2 000 americans revealed that 85 of americans believe getting support is wise yet 74 say society discourages people from doing so one thing that can help is to have more open conversations about mental health struggles and encourage people to seek out help, not judge them. And you know what else helps? BetterHelp. They make connecting with a professional therapist simple, and it actually works. Their live sessions have an average rating of 4.9 out of 5. Don't let stigma stand in the way of support. Start therapy with BetterHelp. Sign up and get 10% off at

betterhelp.com slash J-R-E. That's better H-E-L-P dot com slash J-R-E. There's a bunch of possibilities. I mean, there's almost too many to count, but there's the possibility that they are observing and that they don't want to interfere and that we are on some sort of evolutionary cycle, cycle of cultural evolution, civilization evolution. And one of the things about this, the crazy ages that come from the Sumerian text and from the ancient, the hieroglyphs that depict the Zep-Tet, how do you say it? Zep-Teti? No. How am I saying that? What is that text, that ancient, remember we talked about it with Zahi Hawass and he denied its existence?

Zep-Tepi? Is that it? Either way, you're dealing with these kings that reign for thousands and thousands of years well you know david sinclair is in the middle of this research now that's they're working on life extension drugs like that are actionable yeah yeah that's it zeb tepe yeah um so these but this is what's so weird if they look at hieroglyphs they get to a certain point and they're like oh khufu he was real this guy was real all these people were real yeah but then they get back to these guys that reigned for thousands of years they go oh that was just horseshit yeah but why is it that all these people have these stories that align with this timeline that's pre-flood it's all like the same story yeah and then if you're talking about these ancient hindu scriptures that are discussing technology that seems remarkably similar to technology that we have today yeah the manas are flying cars basically and probably what we're going to have 100 years from now or whatever it is or we could have gone that way in the past and it's very entertaining to think of like let's say something happens to us right i don't want anything to happen but let's say something happens to us and would people really believe we were like launching

reusable rockets right or making facetime calls to people in australia yeah yeah like even fundamental things like all we were doing today um i think it's all like incredible like there's there's a lot of things that could be just technological ideas or maybe people actually had it and the knowledge of it was lost and it's not been documented. It's not been passed along. And so we are skeptical if they ever had it. And so we end up reinventing it in different forms again and again and again. And we keep cycling through this process. Well, it also could be that this is the natural progression of human curiosity. The human curiosity and ingenuity always moves into the world.

These very particular ways, like what's the best way to defeat my enemies? If we're always going to be territorial primates, we're always going to want to defeat our enemies. We're always going to protect ourselves from being invaded. So we're going to make better, and just with technological innovation, it just goes down the same path. Oh, we figure out bullets. Oh, we figure out nuclear bombs. Well, we figure out, well, we don't even have to use an actual plane. We can use an autonomous drone, and that delivers it. And then scale upwards and onwards, and AI, and then also life extension. So if these people were able to make the pyramids, like, you know, there's a lot of speculation as to the timeline of the pyramids.

But let's just say they really built it 2,500 BC. Let's just say back then. What the fuck were they using? Like, what did you do? How did you get these stones down from the mountains that were 500 miles away? How about this one? How about that one? We were going to get to that for sure. No, it's good as any. How about these temples that they find in India that are carved entirely out of one piece of stone? What did you do? How did you do that? How long ago did this happen? How many of them were buried and then they had to uncover them and then like figure out like what is this? Who made it? There's no timeline.

No one really knows. There's no evidence of tools that were capable of doing this kind of work back then. and they're huge and beautiful and perfect and they have like acoustic properties and the geometry is fucking fantastic. Yeah. It's nuts, man. It's not just that all of these temples were actually just built, not just, they were specifically, the locations for them were picked out so that you get the right seismic vibrations over there in terms of like proximity to the ocean, the gravitational waves from the sun and the moon people actually made that level of like look at this man imagine the undertaking of carving that temple out of the side of a fucking giant piece of rock yeah you screw up one thing and it's over there's no simulations you just have to like build it what did they have this is the question like imagine today if we had to do this look it's possible this is a possible endeavor it can be done yeah but imagine what kind of technology would we have to need to map it out to make sure that was all precise that it all i mean it's precise within like millimeters from point to point and everything is done out of one piece of stone like what did they do was it chisels did you do that with chisels that's crazy how

many times you have to sharpen your fucking chisel that's nuts or do you have something completely different because some of the more intricate ones see if you can find these some of the crazy ones inside these temples there's sculptures that are three-dimensional and they're carved like inside of the sculpture so there's like an outer area and then there's these all these openings and then inside it's highly detailed like how'd you even reach in there it just says they use chisels and hammers and i don't think that's possible and careful geometric planning people trying to do that they said like this is how much work someone could do in like 12 hours with a hammer and they get nowhere let alone like perfect and looking good yeah it's nuts man and there's a lot of evidence of stuff like that all over the world which is really weird you have the stuff in peru like socks and huaman when you look at these stones and it looks like they're melted into place and they're 900 tons like what did you do yeah how did he even get it up there how'd you where'd they get it how'd you get it there how'd you line it Terrificly built in only 18 years. How do they know that?

How do they know that because it's attributed to one king? Yeah, so King Christian the first 756 to 773 CE Maybe how do you know though? Our girl just said it would have they calculate it would take him a hundred years to do it Yeah, yeah, I mean this is very like, you know, I don't know different historian accounts are all like muddled up you know well it's a real problem history is a real problem but yeah it goes back to like the thing you were saying right you know what is one thing that's common across all these different ages is human curiosity so i mean that's something that you know i would love to get your take on this um like i've been tying with this idea called the curiosity premium which is the most effective people the most successful people have always been the most curious people the ones who have been good at asking the best questions. And they tend to do better in every aspect of their life.

And you're a good example of that. So that's why I'd love to get your take on this. And the reason I believe that is because long term, people who continuously ask questions tend to do better. They make more money. They have a higher quality of life. They're happy. They have more compounding relationships. People find them more interesting. And so they compound their relationships over time. And so naturally, they end up succeeding. But their spirit of inquiry, their intrinsic curiosity doesn't actually stop once they succeed. They just channelize it even more. And so that's why it keeps compounding. And I would argue that it's the only quality that makes us really human. In this world where we can seek a lot of information, and get information way faster than ever before, it feels like that's that one universal human quality that's existed since ancient time, since the oldest text.

In fact, in the Rig Veda, you're explicitly encouraged to seek wisdom more than wealth. And it's not just an idea specific to Hinduism. That specific idea exists in the Bible, exists in the Quran, exists in the Torah. It's not that seeking wealth is admonished by religious texts. it's actually that it's more important to seek wisdom and um you know like you can that why i said you're a good example of that is like sure you have a very very large podcast but the way you're running it is like you're just curious about a lot of things and asking a lot of questions and i think that's that one quality that's very important so um and i feel like it's the oldest thing it's the only thing that we've known since ancient time being curious well i i think it's stimulating to people. And genuine curiosity is stimulating to other people. When someone is genuinely curious about something, I become curious about it. I think it's contagious.

And I think that it's also an authentic quality. And I think there's something about really wanting to know something and being interested in something. And if you're curious, generally, you're going to ask more questions about something so you have a deeper understanding of it. So if you're trying to do whatever you're trying to do a sport a game you'll probably get better at it because you're more curious because instead of just assuming things you'll ask more questions you'll re-examine things it's genuine it's it's one of the most important human qualities and to me it's one of the most attractive human qualities it's always been when i meet curious people i'm always interested i'm always like like tell me what you're curious about and i'll tell you what i'm curious about let's talk you know it's it's um and this podcast started out genuinely because Because of, well, a lot of it was just talking shit with friends.

But it also led into, like, one of my very first guests, actual guests, was Graham Hancock. And it's just because I was curious. Because I had read Fingerprints of the Gods, and I'd seen him talk. I'd seen speeches. And I'm like, I want to know. Like, what do you know? What do you think's going on? And, uh. He's another guy, incredibly curious and absolutely fascinated with his takes on ancient history. He has been talking about this subject a long time. And when he first wrote Fingerprints of the Gods, I think that came out in like, I want to say it was like 97 or 98 or something like that. And I remember reading it and so many of my friends, you know, educated friends like this is horse shit.

Why are you paying attention to this? more and more and more as time goes on it's been proven that he's correct the timelines shifted back and from the publication of that book the discovery of gobekli tepe and the surrounding area like it's like okay now we realize well there was some crazy shit going on at the very least 11 000 years ago so we pushed civilization back 5 000 years so like and this is just what we found now and we keep finding things keep digging keep looking and then you see the stuff that they're finding underneath the pyramid with this radio tomography where they're looking under the pyramid that it seems that there's structures under the you've seen that stuff i haven't seen that i had the scientist that's involved in it he's an italian guy filippo biondi and he came on the podcast wonderful accent almost as good as yours it was uh amazing uh but he's describing the use of this stuff and that they've used it successfully on known areas in pyramids and other structures. And they can, in fact, there's a, in Italy, there is a particle collider that is underneath a mountain. And using this technology, which is satellite-based technology, they get an accurate description of this particle collider that's i think it's 1200 meters underground like

how how far is that thing underground we'll find out but it's like deep under stone and they find that they can get an accurate like they can actually give you the dimensions of this particle collider they have like an image of it and this same technology is showing that there's these columns underneath the pyramid in various places that are 20 meters wide and they have coils around them they don't know what the hell they are and they the whole structure of this thing it's not small it goes almost a kilometer into the ground there's like this enormous like bottom of it and it seems like it's something that's constructed and so they're like okay well the pyramid is crazy It's crazy enough.

But if there's something underneath it that's a man-made or someone made it that's a kilometer deep into the ground, like, what the fuck are we even talking about? Like, who made this? What did they have? 1.2 kilometers into the mountain. That's nuts. It's a half a fucking mile plus into the mountain. And this thing can see through all that and get this accurate depiction of this particle collider and it's showing with multiple scans, not just one, multiple scans and different technology, the same exact images, the same exact structures underneath this fucking immense 2,300,000 stone structure that almost perfectly aligns to true north, south, east and west.

Like, what? What was going on? Don't tell me police. Don't tell me copper tools. Like, what the fuck was going on? Something crazy. And I have a feeling our simplistic explanation of it is just doing no one any justice. It's doing no service to history. It's doing no service to our understanding. They've got to be a little bit more open in the fact that they are perplexed and not just perplexed by stuff like this. This is a 3D print of an actual vase that exists in Egypt that they found that is they found in tombs of the old. This thing was somehow or another, it's made with diorite, so it's incredibly hard stone, and made to like a thousandth of a human hair.

And it's, yeah, like crazy dimensions. Like the way, the precision of it. And wasn't turned on a lathe because it has handles. So you look at the handles on the side, well, you can't carve those, and those are perfect too. Like the alignment of everything. And it's like, you just look at it, oh, it's a vase, no big deal. but no it's kind of fucking crazy like how did they cut that out there's also these there's all these core marks in some of the stones that they find in egypt and they've analyzed the amount of revolutions per minute that you would have to go through to be able to cut through something and leave these lines and it defies explanation like what is this this is crazy this is not sand and copper and just rubbing things no this is some insane technology that we don't understand there's scoop marks out of the bottoms of some of these stones it's like what about what the fuck is this how'd you scoop rock like what it looks like ice cream like they just went roop like what are they doing there's so many questions what tools did they even have to do all these things they had copper i mean there's there's some evidence that they had some iron and then And I think Tutankhamen had a dagger that was actually made from meteorite, which is interesting.

You know, like when they could find meteorites and make things out of them was very valuable, obviously. But the just the sheer volume of work that they did there, it's like you look at the Temple in Man. You look at the three major pyramids. You look at all the different temples and all the construction. And the older you go, the deeper into the sand they go, the more complex these things are, which is even weirder. So it seems like civilization after civilization, there was probably a rise and fall with their technology as well. Absolutely. I think it's just incredible that none of this knowledge was properly documented ever.

And it's a whole line of work to just go understand how to even rebuild these things, leave alone how did they build it. Well, think about what we're doing. Right? So all of our knowledge is essentially stored on hard drives and paper. Those are the two things that are going to deteriorate the quickest. Maybe we should take a dump of the internet and... Put it on a rock. Go preserve it somewhere so that even if our civilization is wiped out and all the data centers are gone or whatever, whoever comes next can go figure it out. Well, I mean, then you've got to always assume that even if they found a hard drive, that they would, like, how long would it take for them to back engineer what we did and figure out what these ones and zeros actually mean?

Yeah. Which is one of the most bizarre and fantastic accomplishments of modern civilization, is that, like, this is a terabyte, which is nuts. Yeah. Like, I don't know what your first computer had. I don't remember. Definitely not even a gigabyte, probably. No! Yeah. Like a few hundred megabytes was your hard drive. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I remember when they first came out with gigabytes, I was like, this is nuts. Yeah. You remember, like, when Gmail launched and gave everybody, like, free email storage, unlimited email storage, and the bottom sliding bar would just keep increasing in terms of the total allowed size?

Yeah. And that was nuts to me. Yeah. Yeah. And I think, yeah, we take it for granted that we have, like, infinite RAM and infinite hard disk, and nobody has to worry about, like, you know, back in those days you worry about like taking too many photos on your phone right right and you have to go delete all the old ones or bad ones yeah you'd run out of storage on your phone yeah and then you have to buy like an external hard drive to keep storing things yeah you keep transferring stuff from your phone to the hard disk i remember the old android phones you get an sd card yeah you could slip one of those in there and you could store images on that so you could save space yeah and all that stuff is so vulnerable it's so vulnerable and again if a completely alien society had to come down and find our hard drives and they went a totally different path of technology they'd have to back engineer reverse engineer everything that we did try to figure out you know what what what are we using what operating system how's the operating system work is it unix is it linux is it like what is it how do they do it it would be a nightmare they would need an advanced ai to like figure it all out for them right yeah yeah and so uh that's

just if the hard drive survive right so if there's some massive flood cataclysm whatever some some horrific thing that damages all of our electronics which is totally possible you know just some solar flare some intense you know just just just another lab leak yeah right yeah just time a lab leak in time yeah yeah it's nuts and it we could go back to zero real quick and we would basically be like preppers and it would be hard to reverse engineer everything again it would be almost impossible yeah which is why i'm really fascinated by the flood the post-flood timeline because if If these people like Graham Hancock and a lot of these other folks that have speculated that there was probably a very advanced civilization that went in a completely different direction many thousands of years ago, if you look at the emergence of Sumer and Mesopotamia and that area, which a lot of people attribute to be the earliest known civilization, that's around 5,000 plus, 6,000 years ago, right?

Yeah, roughly. So the flood's like 11,000 years ago plus. So you're looking at like 5,000 years of what? It's not even that long in the grand scheme of things. No, not to the earth, but for people. Yeah. Pretty fucking long. Like think of how long it took us to get our shit together. Yeah. It took thousands and thousands and thousands of years of people probably being monsters. Just being the worst. of the worst yeah and that's probably the only way they survived there's probably a lot of cannibalism yeah there's a lot of murder there was a lot of like horrific shit going on for 5 000 years until people slowly but surely figured out agriculture again yeah started building walls everybody relaxed a little got some solid weapons to keep people away so you could work on math and then next thing you know civilization emerges again and it goes right you know goes right back onto the cycle.

And then you start reading in the Rig Veda about stuff that happened thousands of years ago. What the fuck is this? Like, what happened? And that's my belief. I think there was something going on on Earth many, many, many thousands of years before established beginnings of history that was very bizarre. And probably technology that went in a completely different direction than what we're doing now with combustion engines and circuits and all the different things that we use they probably figured out some other kind of technology exactly yeah which is totally possible and it's amazing like it's amazing to think of like what if we could rediscover all that again yes well i would love to be able to i would love to just have a if i could choose one window in time to go back to see what it would look like i would 100 pick ancient egypt while they're building The pyramids.

Show me what the fuck was going on. Just put me in a big hamster wheel. There's a big plastic bubble where no one could see me. Just let me violate space and time and exist there for just a few minutes. Just let me look. I think that would be the most insane thing that you could see about humans and humans' history. Yeah. I just want to know what they knew, what they had, what they used. Just looking at this thing Petra's same time period, at least attributed to. 7,000 roughly B.C. Jesus. And they, you know, how would you do that? How? The details of all those carvings is just insane. Insane. Yeah.

In 7,000 B.C., what are the tools? What the hell were you using? How did you make a temple out of the side of a fucking mountain? Look at the size of it, man. The size of those columns. It would be hard to do anything like this even today. It would be incredibly difficult, insanely time-consuming. Oh, yeah, the Kaleasa Temple, by the way, I don't have it up right now, but in 1650 or so, someone sent 1,000 people to try to destroy it, and after three years of doing nothing, they stopped. They barely made a dent on a couple statues. Yeah, a lot of times when invasions happen in India, like, what?

They tried really hard to fuck it up and couldn't. Oh, wow. That's crazy. That's very robust. that's a great way to describe it it's just there's so much of that stuff that's so interesting because it's so undeniable it's so undeniable in its scale so undeniable in its complexity and the the planning and the the understanding that you you had to have a deep knowledge of geometry yeah of measurement of you had to have accurate yes yeah everything sturdiness like resist like calamities like earthquakes you had that floods what tools are you using yeah like how are you doing this how are you coordinating all these people right getting them to do stuff and i mean sure my conditions must have been very harsher like i'm sure people didn't really have a choice but to do these things because back in those days like the only way you could take care of your food and clothing and shelter is like you commit yourself as a labor laborer to the state to the kingdom but you could also ask like what what gave them the initiative or drive to go do these things yeah well that description is perhaps of a later time we don't even really know what civilization was like when these were constructed.

The real problem is the material science. The real problem is there's a lot of things that you have to have to make those things. It's not as simple as a sculpture, like Michelangelo making a sculpture out of something that's fairly easy to carve into as far as stone goes. Now, this is the scale is it's so undeniable that like something, something, some piece of our understanding is missing. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it like looking at all this, like everyone should just be like a lot more humble. Right. Like like, yeah, we don't actually know that much. Like what we know is like so little, like whatever, like the same thing as what Socrates said, what we know is very, very little.

and the only thing we we should all strive to be is just be curious and um i think there's a lot of tendency for people to like think like oh like we have all this advanced technology we're so amazing like look at us and it's like wait hold on like you don't even understand what happened thousands of years ago and uh there's so much out there to just go and explore and learn and like get better at understanding more what is this place this is yeah this is unreal This is called the Elora Caves, Timeless Wonder Carved in Stone. I think it's all kind of the same area. Yeah, it's the same Elora Cave and the Shiva Temple that you saw.

Look at that. My God. Look at this stuff. It's insane. And again, there's no steel back then. It's actually really symmetrical. It's not even like... Can you go back to the first one with the symmetrical top? Yeah. Look at the symmetry at the top. It's nuts. It looks like that mall in New York they made where the world translates. Yeah, but way more robust. I mean, how? What were they using? This is the thing. It's like the material science aspect of it. It's like you don't have the ability to do. Look at that top one. Go to that top one again, the one that you just had, Jamie. Yeah, that one.

look at that's crazy man i mean i am just blown away when i see stuff like that my mind just starts racing and i just think how did you do this who who was involved how was it planned how is it so symmetrical what were the tools like what were the tools man yeah if you don't have steel you don't have what are you using how'd you do i mean most of it is done with stone clearly right so i guess i guess i doubt it i bet they had something else i bet they had something else that over time eroded just like metal would today i mean if you left a shovel outside today and you came back to that same spot 500 years from now there's nothing that shovel's gone right yeah and you've got to assume that these many thousand year old temples that were carved out of a fucking mountain whatever tools they used probably got absorbed by the earth and the only thing that's remaining yeah yeah it's giving me a weird thought like when they make a big building downtown though they only bring the crane in for a temporary period of time and there's only so many cranes on the planet currently too so right true you take it you move it you go take it to the next spot yep yeah true yeah i don't know yeah especially something like this like if they had

heavy equipment and machinery and whatever the fuck they were using they probably moved it and then moved it out and then it probably rotted away and now it's gone if there was machinery if there wasn't like there must have been something else some other kind of like some technology that we haven't even imagined yeah but it's like their their commitment to art too was so fascinating because these aren't just structures they're fashion projects yeah intensely beautiful yeah intensely ornate yeah so it's not it's not just that they wanted to build like a functional structure yeah that good architecture no it's this it's a fascinating artwork and it's so intricate there's so many different features and so many different images of different people and beings and animals and elephants.

There's one more temple you could pull out. It's called the Tanjar Temple. Oh, I've seen that one too. That was done more recently in the age of the Cholas, and it's pretty incredible. When did they do that one? I don't know the exact number, but more recent than the ones that you saw. All of them are nuts, man. And then there's stuff like that all over the world. Whoa. This was done as a project by the king to basically make a name for himself. Wow. That's incredible. Is that multiple pieces of stone or did he carve that whole thing out of stone too? Probably multiple pieces. So that's actually like construction.

Yeah. Not like removal. The other ones are essentially a giant sculpture. wow it's so pretty look how geometric it is yeah that's what amazes me like they didn't actually have all these simulations and CAD tools and all these things right and uh what year was this made jamie does it say it's just so incredible how much of this stuff exists where it's really baffling like i just found out recently that the aztecs didn't build those temples that they found them really yeah they found like the Tenochtitlan they they call it the place where the gods were born the Aztecs found it and uncovered it and then on the when uh is it Tenochtitlan or uh Teotihuacan whichever one it was on the consecration day when they were done with like whatever they were doing with it to celebrate they killed somewhere between 20,000 and 80,000 people in four days damn not exactly the mindset of the type of people that would construct something like that you know so those are the people that found it and it might have been sitting there for a thousand years and then they came along and said oh this is cool let's live here okay but what was the society that lived there before them and where are they and what happened and how they

do this and why they do it and why did they have it aligned with the constellations like what were they doing yeah it's some of the some of the calculations are pretty pretty amazing like how they timed it how they positioned it how they cared about planetary positions and stuff like that sure like some of it could even be pseudoscience but whatever i think just the level of like calculations they were making back in those days without you know powerful computers is just outstanding it's just nuts and it doesn't make sense it's like okay they're making without powerful computers so what are they using i mean at one point the word computer was just meant to human right like human beings would be doing the calculations that was their only job like to literally like multiply two numbers or like to make some astronomers were actually the first mathematicians the term mathematician and astronomer were used synonymously at one point Really?

Yeah. Why is that? Why studying the stars and math? Yeah, because studying the stars involved making a lot of geometry calculations. And that was kind of actually one of the first set of mathematicians in India. People like Arya Bhatta, Bhaskara, all these guys were actually astronomers too. They were not just mathematicians. And Ari Bata was earlier still like the idea of using zeros, and then he had a lot of like contributions in geometry, and he was doing all this like just because he was interested in astronomy. Isn't there evidence of Pythagorean theorem in ancient, is it ancient Sumerian?

Is it? But it's something that predates Pythagoras. Interesting. My theory is that even though it was not formulated as a Pythagorean theorem, I'm sure people had to understand concepts of sines and cosines and whatever is the right angle for the right incline to get this right level of geometry. You needed to have some implicit understanding of it to build these kind of structures. There's no way you could do it without that. Yeah, 100%. And you have to have incredible measurement tools, like not just the actual mathematics. Okay, the oldest known evidence of Pythagorean theorem dates from old Babylonian clay tablets from about 1900 to 1600 BCE, roughly 1,000 years before Pythagoras.

Isn't that wild? Like, how? How? Clay tablets often cited, use what we now call the Pythagorean theorem to complete, To compute, rather, the diagonal of rectangles and squares, including an excellent approximation. Look at this. This is nuts, man. Vedic ritual text explicitly states the rule equivalent. I don't know how to say that. What is that? A squared, B squared, C squared. C squared. But the diagonal of a rectangle that includes numerical examples predating or roughly contemporary with classical Greek mathematics. So completely different parts of the world. Yeah. And they're coming up with the same stuff.

Exactly. Because they're all curious. That's it. Yeah. They're all curious and eventually all curiosity leads to truth or some form of it. I would argue that anything that's of impact on the world has only been done by curious people. In hindsight, we label those people as successful or smart or rich. But the common trait across all of them has been like curious. Well, that's certainly a powerful trait. and people that aren't curious are not fun yeah they're not interesting so because of that they don't attract other smart or interesting people and therefore they won't be able to do something very meaningful in the world so it's it's it's kind of like um um it's less about and it applies to your personal relationships and personal life too it's not just about professional success like you'll have a more fulfilling life with your wife or your kids if you're a more curious person you ask them more questions you you take interest in them right so that's that's the one quality everybody wants in personal relationships is like taking interest in them and like actually understanding them better or like being curious about common things and um so it's not just that you know being curious leads to success it's more that people around you want you to be

successful if you're curious because um you will have more compounding and fulfilling relationships I would agree with that. Yeah. I'd say it's one of the more important qualities of human beings. I mean, it's led to everything that we have today. All curiosity has led to all of our architecture, math, everything, art, everything. The transistor. Like, you know the story of the transistor? Yeah. So Bell Labs was basically employing as many, like history adjusted, as many telephone engineers back then as the number of software engineers today. But only three people cared enough to question whether you should use these really hot, giant vacuum tubes for amplifying telephone signals.

So vacuum tubes are very big, power-hungry, and very hot, and so they were not fault-tolerant, and it's very expensive. So three people questioned the need for that and came up with the idea of the transistor to amplify current. And that was the Nobel Prize winning discovery. And not just that it was useful to amplify telephone signals, it basically led to the rise of modern computing and we wouldn't have an iPhone like this today if not for those three people. Do you know what the tinfoil hack conspiracy theory about transistors is? No. That they are back engineered from the Roswell crash along with fiber optics.

Tell me more. So we read this on the podcast. Remember, Jamie, there's the two scientists that were attributed. There's this one scientist that said they weren't even remotely exceptional guys and that they gave them the credit for this so that they didn't have to reveal the true nature of where this technology came from. I see. Interesting. So, again, tinfoil hat securely on our heads. This is not something I believe. This is just something that's fun. there's a few inventions that came out of that time period, roughly after 1947, that are weird. And one of them is fiber optics and one of them is a transistor.

And these are supposedly attributed to back engineering programs. So the Roswell crash, I don't know if you ever paid any attention to it. It's a real weird one because the cover of the Roswell Daily Record said that the government has a crash disk that landed in the desert. a bunch of witnesses a bunch of people saw it it's also people that saw supposedly saw physical bodies of these creatures and supposedly again who knows what's true but Truman went to the site he visited it and then the planes two separate planes were flown to Wright-Patterson Air Force base which was I think was just Wright base back then I don't think it was Wright-Patterson but They flew them out, and the idea was this material was so important they didn't want to risk one plane crashing, so they flew it in two different planes.

And that this stuff has always been known to be stored at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. That's what everybody always talks about. And then a lot of it was moved to Bell Labs. Oh, wow. There was a company called the American Computer Company. And back in the day, the American Computer Company was just like – it was a consumer website where you could go and say, oh, I need a Windows computer that does this, that, and the other thing. And you could just put in whatever your specs were and they would build it for you. But they all had a whole section of their website dedicated to Bell Labs and back-engineered UFO technology.

And all they talked about in this one – like whoever ran it was like a fucking kook. I don't know. Is that still around? That website? Yeah. American Computer Company, is it still around? Interesting. So this is like the 1990s, I think. So you're saying your theory, I mean, not that you believe in it, but your theory is that the transistor was not, like, invented. It was known and it was given to the Bell Labs. There's apparently a giant leap between the first ideas of the transistor and then what actually came about and how much money had to be spent to create it off of this leap. This was this assertion by these scientists that were trying to examine this.

The thing about Bell Labs is there's a military base right outside of Bell Labs. And they say, well, that military base is to guard New York City. But New York City is quite a flight away. But Bell Labs is right there. And they were working on some deep, dark shit at Bell Labs for sure. Because I've had a bunch of people on that were talking about remote viewing exercises that they were doing out of Bell Labs. you know we've had a bunch of people that came on and and talked about various programs that were going on that were like top secret programs that were happening that were being run through bell labs like there's some weirdness to that place like real weirdness interesting yeah and it's fun yeah the idea that like yeah Because it definitely feels very disconnected, like, okay, like you were using all these vacuum tubes, and then suddenly you're like, okay, like, what if we just use semiconductors?

Okay, there's definitely a pretty far drift from what you're doing currently to what you're supposed to do. mm-hmm and um um and also the the the idea of the first transistor and what ended up being used in chips the junction transistor are quite different too so they're like big leaps in terms of what the core idea was it's not an incremental change um the way i thought about it was like okay that's like tens of years of work and that's why they made a big change and so if you actually looked into the individual milestones they had, maybe it would have looked pretty different. But your conspiracy theory is pretty interesting.

It's always fun. Yeah. And also, there's just too many stories of this. And David Grush has, you know, on oath said that there are back engineering programs and he was read into these and that they've been around for a long time. But this is the assertion of that movie, The Age of Disclosure, that the real problem is that they have misappropriated funds and lied to Congress. And so they come out and tell you, OK, we do have this program. Well, guess what? Everybody goes to jail because you guys are a bunch of liars and you've been stealing money and you've been doing it, whatever you want to do with this money.

I don't know, like how much how much oversight is there on back engineering UFO programs, you know, so probably a lot of people get in trouble. A lot of people go to jail. On top of that, these things are all being done by weapons manufacturers. right like where are you gonna bring them to well you're gonna bring them to Lockheed Martin are you gonna bring them to you know Rocketdyne or it's gonna be someone that does that kind of work yeah you're not gonna do it on your it's not gonna be like we'll do it no you're gonna have to bring it to people that already make spaceships or bring it to people that already make jets yeah and so they have a massive competitive advantage over any other company that's doing it so then there's other companies that also had contracts with the United States government they can sue and so he lays out all the problems with disclosure and their assertion is that the only thing what we need if we really want to find out the truth is we're going to need widespread amnesty for all these people that were involved my problem with that is that's what i would say too if i had been stealing money for decades and decades i'd be like all right we need amnesty and then i'll tell you where all this stuff is i'm like

how do we know what this stuff is whether or not these are just top secret military programs with advanced propulsion technology that's unavailable to the public and they're going to say that is aliens and they back engineered this and they did that like they clearly don't want to tell people they don't want people to know i think a large part of it is probably because they could get in trouble but i think also a large part of it is because it's fun to keep secrets from people yeah especially when you're the government why tell them fuck those people yeah fuck them they don't even know ufos are real meanwhile you know we're going into a bunker in the middle of the mountain and we're remote viewing you know it's it's probably there's probably a lot of fun involved in having access to information that most people would kill for yeah i mean there's so much information that um we just we just don't have access to which brings me to this question with it seems like one of the things that's happening with both with ai and with technology in general is that you have more and more access to information and more and more answers to questions than ever before yeah at a certain point in time there's going to be no bottleneck

yeah and we're going to know everything about everything yeah so how is anyone in government going to keep a secret? How is any corruption ever going to be possible? At a certain point in time, all of it will get uncovered. Like, it's much more difficult. It's difficult to commit murder now with DNA evidence, right? Back in the 1800s, like, I didn't see nothing. I wasn't there. And then you're free. Like, now they do your fingerprints. Now they get your DNA. Now there's flock cameras. There's, like, more and more and more. It's harder to get away with things. So it seems like, to me, like, whatever they have, whatever anybody has, ultimately there's going to come a point in time where there's so much data and so much information, and you could run all your questions.

It's like there's an AI fact checker for politicians now. Yeah. So while a politician is giving a speech, you can run an AI fact checker, and in real time, it will tell you whether or not these people are full of shit. It seems like the direction is there's not going to be anybody full of shit in the future because it's not going to be possible. Yeah. I mean, the government still would have access to things that we human beings wouldn't have access to, like regular people, and particularly defense-related, weapons-related. Like, for example, when they did the Venezuelan thing, I don't think people in Venezuela even understood, like, what even those weapons were.

I don't think we did. We were the general public. Yeah, they were described as something, the literal words used were, like, alien-like technology. So even we didn't know that the United States had access to that quality of defense technology until that incident happened. So there are obviously going to be secrets, right? Especially the highest stakes things. I would say like building frontier AI models is similar to that. Of course, as more and more models are getting open source, I think the knowledge is diffusing, but still the true amount of details that you need to actually train a really amazing frontier reasoning capability model is still not like widely diffused.

So my hypothesis is that whatever is extremely high stakes will still not be widely diffused. At least there will be enough structures in place to keep it secret. Forever? Not forever, but for a while. For a while. Yeah. That's the thing. Long term, sure. Things do get out and people do understand. But it feels like long term is what I'm looking at. Like, look, when we're looking at history, we're talking in these, like, when we're looking at all these different temples and all these different things, we're talking about thousands and thousands of years. And thousands of years time span in between each individual one.

With our world, we're talking about massive change in 200 years. Like, this country is 250 years old. Think about how kooky that is. Yeah. That is a blink of an eye in history. But do we understand everything that happened in the United States? No. Exactly. Okay, so there are still some details that are hidden from us. We don't fully understand everything, right? For now. Yeah. But my question is, as time goes on, 250 years from now, is it even possible to keep any secrets from anybody? And is that a good thing? It might be a good thing. It sounds horrible to people because they're like, oh, my God, what about privacy?

Right, but also what about lies? Yeah. No more lies? like everyone's going to know what you're thinking everyone's going to know everything people do all the time yeah i mean if you're a true surveillance state obviously there are no secrets right um except about the government itself that's the problem yeah does it bottleneck with the government or does it get to a point where there you can't even have government secrets because as technology evolves and as human civilization evolves secrets will be less and unless not just necessary, but sequels would be problematic because there'll be an impediment to knowledge.

There'll be an impediment to understanding the true scope of what the world is, like the true nature of all of our various moving parts. Yeah. I mean, as long as the human quality, the intrinsic human quality of curiosity and truth-seekingness, which is, you know, universal, it's existed ever since we've known human beings, if that continues and that continues to be the case, then people will have enough incentives to figure out the truth. Yeah. And if something is actually hard to get to, it only motivates you more to actually go and find it. For sure. So my question is, where does this all go? You know, and you obviously work in AI. And when you think about AI, and when you think about just technology in general, and you extrapolate, you just take it from here, and you just plot it out. Like, what is a possible scenario of 250 years from now? Like, what does it even look like? What does the United States look like at 500 years old?

It's very hard to know. I'll be very honest. I think it's very hard to know even five years from now how it's going to look like. That's crazy. Yeah.

Right. Worst case scenario is civilization upheaval, chaos, civil war. And it's possible even without an AI. Right. Yeah. Look, we've gotten real close to it a couple of times. Exactly. Yeah. And we did not need an AGI-like scenario for a civilization collapse in the past, as you've clearly seen.

Right. A calamity can just take out all of us, wipe out everything. Sure, especially natural ones. Yeah, that's why I'm not a big fan of everybody claiming that the AI is going to kill us or AGI is going to destroy humanity and it's too dangerous and we all need to stop doing these things. But at the same time, continuing to build all these data centers and continuing to make money. You have to have one consistent position. My position is that whether AI or not, I think being curious is going to serve you really well. I think it's going to help you have a better life. and there are two paths to curiosity one that can kill it and one that can supercharge it in my opinion the one that kills curiosity is algorithmic feeds like the brain rot that you're fed every day which is you know this continuous doom scrolling that's bad And the one that can supercharge it is AI.

Okay, like, now that you could just ask whatever you want. If everybody has, like, a pull-it-up Jamie for them, you know? Right. And that's amazing. So all you have to do is be curious about a lot of different things. And, of course, talk to interesting people, engage in interesting activities together. If money is no longer an issue, you can fund passion projects yourself. You don't have to, like, require government funding or venture funding. like what if you just wanted to build a mini cave yourself okay like you find a piece of land somewhere there's a lot of land in america uh way more land than we know what to do with it and um and and surely we can build a lot of interesting things there well that's a good glass half full scenario and one of the things that i keep coming to is this whole idea of people working and making money and having careers and having portfolios and bank accounts and all that, this is all very recent in human history.

Yeah. Very recent. Very recent. It's very recent. But we've become accustomed to this as a way of life and we... And Microsoft, Microsoft built this concept of a knowledge worker because they wanted to sell more office software. Really? Yeah. Like this whole idea of putting a PC on every desk and making you like glue to the PC was there. That was Bill Gates' mission. Put a PC on every desk. That fucking wizard. What an incredible accomplishment because, boy, did they nail it. Yeah, so it was not about making computing beautiful or anything in the way Steve Jobs envisioned it. Right. It was just about selling computers.

Sell more software. Sell more computers because that way you can sell more software. And if you sell more software, you become rich. And the company just was a machine that was just built essentially a large sales machine that's built to sell software and and and uh and uh now they sell cloud but whatever like that that's essentially the uh the reason that like you know we all got trained to use software people went and did tutorials on how to use excel how to use word how to use all these email tools and then now that became the upscaling you needed to go work at different companies and then write code and like whatever right so that if that part's going to be done by an ai it's not necessarily a bad thing because this is not actually the way you feel like real purpose and fulfillment in your own life if if you were never exposed to that whatever you had as the intrinsic curiosity in you that that's probably what you should be doing yeah there could be a completely new way to live life yeah where we're not dependent upon labor for basic needs and but then it's going to be incumbent upon people they're going to have to figure out a way to be either self-starting or we're going to have to expose people to things

that are going to excite their curiosity and make that a mandate yeah it has to start from schools

is so important because one of the things that was really weird about the whole COVID pandemic was that we weren't supposed to question science.

Yeah. Or when Fauci said, if you question Anthony Fauci, you are questioning science. That's because they try to assign credibility through their degrees. Yes. Through their affiliations. Yes. Appeal to authority. But not through the scientific method. Right. Anybody should be allowed to ask questions as long as they are open to new evidence. Yeah. And that's the most important quality. of a scientist. Well, the scientific method alone, I mean, it's one of the most important things that we can use to try to figure out what's real and what's not real. And as soon as someone says, don't use it, don't question, well, wait a minute.

And then there was an actual government push to silence questioning, and legitimate researchers were kicked off of Twitter because they didn't back the narrative. Yeah. Like, this is all anti-science. This is not – you're questioning science. Science demands questioning. It's what it is. Yeah. When you don't understand something, the best thing you can do is ask all possible questions. Right. And so curbing that is almost like a way of saying, look, I'm going to tell you what happened. You need to believe in my worldview. And I'm not open to new perspectives. I wonder if anybody has used AI to try to map out possible scenarios for where technology leads human civilization and what could be done to mitigate the problems and push it in the proper direction, like have a bunch of different models of how this could play out.

Yeah. I mean, I try to do that for fun, but I haven't done it in a serious enough way to have a proper answer to that. Right. Right. But I think like, you know, a lot of things that we are doing today will not be considered needed or valuable. And maybe a little bit of taking our own lessons from the past. I don't know if you when you grew up as a student, did you have to like be good at mental math, like multiplying arbitrary numbers? Was that considered a sign of smartness or remembering people's phone numbers or something? Well, you had to because there was, I mean, you had little address books.

That's what we used to carry around. I had a little address book that I keep on my desk. It's a little tiny thing with everybody's number and name. That's the only way I knew people's numbers. And I remembered a bunch of them, like all my friends. I had all my friends. I don't have any of my friends' numbers remembered. Maybe my wife and my friend Eddie. I have two numbers in my head. But was there a time when people thought somebody was smart based on how good their memory power was? Oh, yeah, definitely. Would you say that now? Well, people are impressed if you know things now. I have a bunch of weird information, obviously, that I've gathered through so many years of doing this podcast and just so many years of being curious.

And, you know, sometimes even my own daughter is like, how the fuck do you know that? I'm like, this is what I do. Like, that's my thing. Yeah. You know, I pay attention to stuff. Yeah. But, yeah, I mean, memory itself is always very impressive. And someone has an excellent memory. Yeah. And can pull out facts of the past. Yeah. We automatically equate that to intelligence. Yeah. I think it's impressive, but it's not necessarily a sign of being intelligent, right? Like, I think it's just a look. You have a very fast lookup table in your head. That's great. It's very valuable. But I still think, like, being smart is all about posing the most interesting questions.

Also, the decisions that you make and whether or not you self-correct when you make mistakes. Yeah. Yeah, all those things. Exactly. So when you have an amplifier to intelligence, like an AI, all the time, lookups is essentially something you can delegate. Reasoning for decision-making is something you can delegate. but posing the right questions to gather the right data and then forming your own judgment based on what it reasons and comes up with and finally having the courage to make the decision that's still you that agency, that intrinsic curiosity to ask the right question the scientific intellectual humility to gather new evidence always questioning your beliefs that is still you and so I feel like that is essentially what would be considered smart in the ages to come if somebody is like a, you know, like a proxy scientist or whatever, like no more, doesn't have to go to like MIT or Harvard and get a PhD to be a scientist or to be considered a scientist.

Because all scientific literature is open and it's accessible to everybody and you can even take a paper written by an expert and use an AI, understand it deeply, ask a lot of questions and maybe even disprove what they claim to be true. That's the whole peer review process, right? The peer review process is all about questioning somebody's paper. And that's why, like, you know, whatever you said happened in the COVID days is wrong. Like, you should be allowed to ask questions about even eminent scientists' work. It's okay. Like, if you're dumb and you had the wrong questions, sure, you're going to learn from that.

It's worse than not being allowed to ask the question. Yeah, agreed. It's going to be interesting to see what the future of education looks like. Like, how valuable are degrees when essentially AI is going to be able to do the majority of whatever work you need done on a variety? Like, how good are they right now at just law? Like, you could ask questions. Pretty good. Pretty amazing, right? Yeah, yeah. Pretty good. How good are they at mathematics? Perfect. Like, how good are they at coding? Way better than people. Yeah. And at a certain point in time, it's going to be interesting to, like, what is education now?

Is education just providing you with information because that information is readily available? Or is education teaching you how to think, teaching you how to pursue your interests and be curious and have intellectual humility and understand what you know and what you don't know? I think that's where it should be. I still think institutions will preserve their brand value because there is a certain aspect of education that's outside of learning, which is just having access to other curious and intelligent people. Sure, community. Yeah, and brands attract good communities, peer groups, blah, blah, blah.

But the actual process of learning... has to change, and what you're rewarded for has to change. Fundamentally, everything flows downstream of the incentive, right? So if the incentive is to score the highest on the exam based on answers, you're not really changing much. You need to change that process. You need to change the process of what do you reward a student? Like, what is A plus or A? Right. That's where we need to start at. Let's also, you know, we talked about this the other day, that the education system in this country was designed to make workers. Exactly. That's what they did when they first started doing it in the turn of the century.

Curriculum was designed around that, yeah. In India, it's still the case, by the way. Really? Even if you go into a computer science degree, I don't know if it's still the case. I shouldn't misspeak, but at least when I was there and for many years after, the first two years, you just spend learning hardcore electrical and mechanical engineering. You would learn like welding using late machines. You would have to, like, go and, like, do workshops, carpentry, a lot of these things. It was fun. I would think there would be a lot of value in that. So in hindsight, I actually think it was fun to learn soldering and, like, how to, like, make circuits on red boards and circuit boards.

But if somebody was just interested in some, you know, just writing code, let's say, back then, all this is kind of, like, pointless to learn. but you had to go through it to be qualified as an engineer. So, and the reason the curriculum was designed that way is because that's what the labor force was required back then to build like oil factories and like all these things. So you had to learn mechanical engineering, you had to learn fluid mechanics, whatever. But I think that should also change because if the way like you do work changes, then what you're trained for in college should also change.

And it's much harder to change these things. You know, people are much slower. They're scared to do changes. Disruption is always, like, looked down upon. And so I think let's at least start at the incentive structure right from the schools, right from the colleges. Like, let's not, like, reward people based on, like, how much they know. Well, it seems like in the future when things do radically change and it seems like they're inevitable, they're going to radically change. universities and schools are going to be rewarded for having developed thinkers that are able to adapt to this new world that's right yeah so they're going to have to figure out how to adjust their curriculum yeah because the the tools are so spectacular now that just this idea of just memorizing information is it's not that's not what you're going to need yeah to get by in the future It's not. And I guess like one proxy different schools use is like maybe if more entrepreneurs arise out of your school, you probably create a lot of independent thinkers because they are like willing to take a fresh perspective towards a problem.

Right. and build their own thing from scratch. And fundamentally, that's what America has always been about, is the American dream of coming here and having your own idea and still be taken seriously by a bunch of people. The whole idea of venture capital only exists here, or like family and friends around. There's a whole idea of just having your friends help you to bootstrap a business and then turning it into a success. And success doesn't mean like multi-billion or 10 billion or whatever, right? Like, as long as it pays you enough that you don't have to work for somebody else and you can live a fulfilling life and you can just go explore your passions, that's success.

That's actually a better success than creating a company based on what other people want you to do and then hating your job for it. Yeah, and having a yacht and being miserable and working every day. That's why I said, like, not the smartest, the richest people are not always the ones who have the most fulfilling lives. the most curious people have the most fulfilling lives because they have better relationships. They're actually able to sit and look at something and be curious. Instead of being worried about what's going on. What did the American dream, what was it to you when you weren't in America?

Yeah, and if you're not, find something else. It's fine. I respect that. There's nothing wrong with that. Exactly. And the country has enough jobs to provide for all kinds of needs, right? And everybody goes through different phases in their life.

Sometimes they feel a little lazy or like disillusioned, okay? And so what I like about this country is that there's a lot of curious people here. There's a lot of like so many different people, you know, like whether they use AIs or not AIs, they're all like finding meaning in like so many interesting projects. Well, obviously, I don't know any other country really because I was born here. But the people that do talk to me about what the American dream is like from another country, they're the most passionate and the most supportive of this idea, this experiment in self-government. And just the whole idea that the country operates on, that anybody can chase their dream, that you can.

If you have a dream and you're willing to work hard, you could actually do it in this country. That's right. But, yeah, that's, you know, it's most, the people that are most passionate about that idea oftentimes are people that come from somewhere else where that wasn't available. And it's not just, like, you know, people coming from one particular country or another. It's the attitude. It's the way the system works and rewards you to, like, be bold and take bets against established players. It's okay, right? It's okay to, like, be an upstart, a challenger. And people love that, like, underdog.

And I think, you know, that's fantastic. And that culture is continuing. Yes, there are like multi-trillion dollar companies here, and they're all going to become even bigger. But people still want the young, hungry person to also be successful. Yeah. Well, they love disruptors. Yeah. And people love underdogs in this country. Yeah. Yeah. It's universal. It's not specific to technology. Right. Like, I'm sure everybody would love an underdog story that wants to go against, like, Coca-Cola or Pepsi or something, too. Oh, in sports, it's our favorite thing. In sports, yeah. We don't like when the guy who's supposed to win wins.

We love when the guy who's not supposed to win triumphs. Yeah. Yeah. The underdog story. Yeah. That's a very uniquely American story. To me, that's what this country is. I mean, sure, there's a lot of obstacles and challenges. Just like every other country, there are things here that are challenging. But it's one thing that has consistently stayed true.

um what do you think happens with social media because social media and as you were talking about before like algorithms like it's one of the biggest problems in terms of the way people view the world yeah i'm curious what you think like you know like my my opinion is that it's not good for the kids it's terrible for them yeah but i think they should have some exposure to it because i think it's good to know that it's a thing and i think children are fairly resilient and they learn but the anxiety levels of kids is much higher than ever before yeah suicidal ideations higher self-harm yeah yeah i'm a little my belief is that um when you're just fed of feed

and and and the algorithm of the social media company decides what you're going to see next it it curbs your curiosity and i i don't i don't think things that curb human curiosity should be encouraged yeah i agree and so if the app is designed in a way where it asks you what you're interested in and helps you to come up and find things that that are very related to what you're interested in right that's awesome but that's not how it works it's literally like it starts with something you start doing scrolling and then start showing you what you just scroll and then you end up in an echo chamber and and that's not that's not necessarily good well you can get trapped yeah you can get i'm in a trap of schizophrenics lately on instagram but it's just mostly schizophrenic Like people that tell me they're the rightful president of the United States and like you tell the guy hasn't showered in days and you know and if you have a phone you can create an account and you just start uploading nonsense and then for whatever reason I've watched a couple of them so now they just keep showing them to me.

And it's full of AI slop right now, like a lot of AI slop. Like it's not even clear and it's not labeled also clearly whether it's been made with AI or not. So often, so essentially it's leading to a complete loss in trust where when I see something, I don't even know if it's real anymore. Right. And it's going to get worse. Yeah, it's going to get worse. To the extent that you're going to like, your default would be that this is AI. and then like you're gonna have to go through multiple layers to finally verify if it was real and and even like verified accounts post a lot of ai stuff so it's not it's not about like whether the account is verified by meta or some or whatever right so i think fundamentally i i'm i i feel like okay the way i think about it is what are pieces of technology if did not exist uh would would be a really bad thing for the world and what are pieces of technology did not exist wouldn't even matter and and i feel like social media is more towards a second yeah like you know uh searching for information and answering questions and like getting you know ais to like do things for you uh help you learn new things faster all that stuff is some we need more of that

because it supercharges our curiosity. Whereas like brain rot feeds with AI slop doesn't actually supercharge our curiosity. It actually curbs our curiosity. And so if we believe in the curiosity premium idea, we need to encourage things that supercharge our curiosity and discourage things that curb our curiosity.

metro and you just see people just scrolling through their feed nobody everybody doing it you look the entire car everyone's doing it's just insane yeah it's weird yeah i always say that if there was a drug that existed that made people stare at their hand for six hours a day, everybody would be like, get that out of here.

But that's essentially what we're doing because most of what people are looking at most of the time, they don't even remember. They're just scrolling through this thing. It's brain rot. It's just brain rot. It curbs your curiosity. I mean, Apple has these settings in different apps. Have you tried this? What? You can set the timer for every app. No, I just use discipline. I don't engage very much anymore. I dip my toe into X every day for a few seconds. I go, what's everybody mad at? What's going on? Who stole this? How much corruption's here? Who got killed there? Okay, bye. And then I just check out.

I don't want to do it. And Instagram to me is just nonsense. I just look at that every now and then for nonsense and occasionally something interesting. Really, YouTube is my main go-to thing. Yeah. Because YouTube is my most unregretted minutes. Yeah. YouTube for me is always interesting. There's always like some cool thing on cosmology. There's some. I watch fights on YouTube. I watch professional pool matches. That's what I do for the most part. That's where I really like find my actual interests and fulfill my curiosity. Long form content is what human mind should be trained to consume more of, whether it's books, whether it's like, you know, 30 minute videos explaining something.

And you need to train your mind to actually complete it. That's actually the biggest problem of the younger generation. The more they're in the reels experience, short form video, they're unable to actually like complete like long videos anymore. That's true. But also at the same time, the rise of podcasts is happening. Yeah, and it's great. It's great. So it's not universal. It's like there's a lot of people that don't find fulfillment and all the doom scrolling and all the nonsense, and they really do want. Yeah, I'm particularly just focused on the younger generation. I'm sure people like us can adapt to like, okay, let's say maybe we have a temporary addiction to social apps.

But a lot of the young people are the people like, I meet kids like at the mall that are 11 that listen to my podcast. Yeah. Wow. I know, it's nuts. They go, I love your podcast. I'm like, who lets you listen? Get out of here. No, I'm always joking around about it. That's amazing. That's really cool. But no, there's a lot of particularly young boys that come up to me all the time that are interested in it. That's amazing. I love it. I love it because then they're going to get exposed to some interesting ideas. And it will also encourage them to have those kind of conversations with each other.

Right. Yeah. Whose podcast do you listen to? I love Tim Dillon's. He's probably my favorite because it's the most accurate and also satirical and hilarious view on everything that's going on in the world in terms of, like, war and world news and culture shit. And he's my favorite. He was just on here yesterday. I fucking love that guy to death. He's so funny. so crazy it's like his mind works in such a unique way and it's developed because his podcast is different where he very rarely has guests so most of the time it's just him ranting and his producer laughing and he's the best ranter that's ever lived i don't think there's anybody that's even close he's the goat like there's like i don't think there's any argument every comedian agrees like as far as like just the ability to just sit in front of a microphone and rant like bill burr does it well he's good at it there's a few other guys that are good at it no one's as good at it as tim he's the most consistently entertaining and then for just mind not mindless but like to escape i listen to a lot of archery shows and hunting shows where they're talking about different tactics and hunting or different techniques and archery new equipment and new

innovations archery is an interesting thing because every year bow manufacturers make a better bow and like tiny little engineering changes of these bows like it's a weapon that's been around for who knows how many thousands of years but what the and you're able to feel those improvements oh yeah yeah you feel the difference every year hoyt puts out a new bow and every year I'm like, motherfucker, they did it again. It's better. So just tiny changes, less vibrations in the hand, more balance in the shot, you know, more forgiving in terms of accuracy. I love that stuff. So I get really fascinated by engineering, really fascinated by automotive engineering.

I'm really interested in, like, that's another thing where, like, every year people figure out how to make a car that can hold more Gs on a skid pad, that can get around the track quicker. Like every year they're battling to see who can get around the Nürburgring quicker. And what are they doing? They're adding horsepower, increasing suspension travel and suspension tuning rather and making them more compliant or making them stiffer and making them more adjustable and then like tire compounds. And I'm just interested in anything that where someone's working on something and getting better at something or getting new information.

I love history podcasts. I listen to a bunch of history podcasts. so that's most of the time when I'm if I'm listening to something I either want to be entertained or want to be educated educational yeah yeah and that's entertaining yeah what about you what kind of stuff do you listen to I mean I listen to your stuff I listen to Lex there's this guy um I mean you know you might you had him on like Rick Rubin of course sure yeah love that guy yeah yeah he's he's awesome I listen to his stuff um and um I mean I also watch like some I mean, interesting videos about, you know, concepts I don't understand.

There is this YouTube channel, Veritasium. You should check it out. What is it called? Veritasium. How do you spell that? V-E-R-I-T-A-S-E-U-M. Veritasium. What does it mean? I think. Is that someone's name? No, Veritas just means like seeking truth kind of thing. Oh, okay. Is it this channel? Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's like a subscriber? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Ooh, okay. 20.9 million subscribers obviously a lot of people agree so they make all these very interesting videos about like stuff that you know you would be curious about but you never actually bother to ask that or learn more about and explain some of the most under understood companies or like phenomena and I just love watching it this is kind of like my idea of doom scrolling I like watching like 20 videos at once.

Yeah, I am going to subscribe to it right now. It's pretty cool. veritasium there it is got it subscribed bam and explains all these like fun concepts that are you know you take it for granted like okay why is google maps really fast like okay it'll tell you what's going on how the data is used across so many different people at once and all these different cia's new tech doesn't make sense exactly we were just talking about that yesterday we were doubting it you know the heart murmur thing do you know about that no so the pilots that were downed in uh iran they said that they have this technology that allows them i think they could use it up to 70 miles and they could detect a very unique heart rate like your heart rate is different than my heart rate they could know it's you you could be hiding in the mountains and they could find you from 70 miles away with this technology wow a lot of people like beams or waves or something and well it's called what is it called quantum magnetometry is that what they call it i think that's what it was remember we looked it up yesterday they're using the word quantum and not explaining what they're doing like how they're doing it and you're like okay

is that real or is this some invented horseshit to cover the fact that they have some very sophisticated satellite imagery where they can have a detailed map of literally the entire surface of the world they know exactly where people are but they don't want our enemies to know that they have this capability so they're making up something i see that was my suggestion yesterday that like maybe they're full of shit because the whole thing seems nuts what is it called you got it is it's quantum magnetometry sure it was i mean tell me i don't know exactly yeah so this guy he's saying it doesn't make sense yeah and a lot of people say it doesn't make sense like it doesn't seem to vibe with anything that we know that we can do magnetometry yeah first time i'm hearing it see the pull up the decrypt this description the uh official description of what this stuff is capable of so this is supposedly some very advanced cia tech that allowed them to locate this downed pilot interesting maybe or maybe there's something else going on or maybe there's some other methods that they use they don't want the enemy to know about maybe some beacon these guys have on them yeah i guess what's the incentive for cia to actually describe how their technology works yeah zero yeah why

would they tell you that yeah why would they tell you they even have that that's crazy yeah and then And Jamie had a good point. But the capability is insane. Detecting your heart rate 70 miles away is just insane. How? Insane. Yeah, how? And when they throw the word quantum in things, I always go, hmm. Hey, what happened with that White House announcement? Sorry, I keep... The quantum computing? Yeah, remember? There's Q News coming soon, and then at the bottom of the text, Q sounds for quantum. Oh, I see. Is that what it is? I thought they just announced a bunch of investments in a bunch of quantum companies.

Maybe that's it. Yeah, IBM was getting some funding or whatever. So this quantum magnetometry, can you pull up a description of what it is? Sorry, I started looking up the wireless thing. Sorry, I was asking you too many questions at the same time. Quantum sensor help rescuers. Yeah, so this is it. Ghost murmur. Yes, that's what it's called. Purported surveillance technology utilizes long-range quantum magnetometry. What is that? Quantum magnetometers measure extremely faint magnetic fields, including the body's natural electromagnetic signals, by tracking changes in the energy states of atoms or subatomic particles.

What? Technology reportedly uses microscopic defects in synthetic diamonds. When illuminated by a laser, these centers are hypersensitive to tiny magnetic fluctuations. Wow. The heart signal, while human heartbeats produce a magnetic field, is extremely weak, around 50 to 100 picoteslas, and typically degrades over very short distances. So the Ghost Murmur deployment, they reportedly used Ghost Murmur during a mission in southern Iran to pinpoint the location of a downed American airman hiding in dense mountainous terrain. by mounting these quantum sensors into a helicopter the system purportedly registered the pilot's heartbeat from afar okay does that sound like more shit i mean not it doesn't sound full of shit but like basically the part that sounds surprising to me is how they're able to deal with all this like distance and attenuation across the distance right and all this interference and they claim to use ai for that but nothing is really described on how they use it. Right. So if they're not describing how they use it, why are they even telling us they have it? There's a lot of skepticism on it. Yeah. Laws of physics. Physicists point out that the heart's magnetic field is a million times weaker than the Earth's. Detecting it at a range of miles

rather than centimeters defies currently published peer-reviewed physics. Alternative explanations suspect that while quantum sensors were likely on board, they were probably tracking the radio waves of a survival beacon the metal in the pirate pilot's equipment or using traditional thermal infrared and radar capabilities rather than detecting a raw heartbeat via magnetic fields i do remember seeing a different part of a when that story happened back in april someone did report on like one of the military websites that there was a survival beacon that they used to track them and that the whole quantum number stuff was like nonsense yeah i saw that but No one wants to report that.

It's not fun, right? No, the ghost murmur thing is awesome fun. And if that is real, like, boy, you can imagine a world 100 years from now where that is real. So it's exciting. Oh, yeah. 100 years is a long time for this to be real. Yeah. 100 years, they probably got it down pat. Then that's the problem. You can't hide from the robot dogs from Black Mare. Yeah. You know? Yeah. Do you ever, while you're working in AI, do you ever wonder, like, is this the downfall of humanity? Is this a good thing to be worked on? Did you ever have, like, doom moments? Not on specific things I'm working on, but in general, I do worry about, like, how much, you know, you obviously want to, like, stay in charge and, you know, be in control of your experience.

Still be the one driving change. and have a lot of agency for yourself so i do worry that like it's all about like making sure everybody's upskilled and understanding like where the future is headed and not being like fed only like dangerous apocalyptic messages and because it's very essential that human beings retain their agency and staying curious right like so if that stops being the case if you start subscribing to the vision that okay your jobs are done you don't really have any meaning in the world and we'll pay you some dividends and you just sit at home and chill. That is not a good thing.

And I feel like there are not enough voices in AI that are actually saying anything different to that. And I like when Jensen was here, I think he was a little different. I think he tried to give a more positive version where he said, okay, like the radiologist thing, if all radiologists can take away, they start doing different kind of work. So I think we need to start looking at like, okay, first of all, guys, relax. You have one premium skill, your curiosity. So let's figure out ways to channelize that. Let's change the way work is done in companies. Let's change the way educational institutions run.

Let's change the incentive structures. And let's help you build new ideas and new companies and explore things that are not even being considered. And the government should obviously support all these initiatives. So that's what needs to happen more. but what's happening actually right now is um okay like hey guys you're all losers you're going to lose your jobs and and don't blame me because i'm i told you so right and um and and and still give us money because we're still going to do it anyway and so that's what's happening more and i think uh we should stop doing that that that's my opinion well it is the problem is it's kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy and if you tell people that they're going to be a loser and you're going to, their life is over.

They're going to think that way. Instead of giving them an understanding of like, look, this can open up new doors for you. And anytime there's any sort of disruptive technology, there's always the fear that it's going to go badly. This was the case with the locomotive. This was the case with when the printing press was invented. Yeah. By the way, I did some research on this where an industrial revolution happened. um people got new ideas um okay like for example uh when the industrial revolution happened um who came up with the idea of a steel plow john deere until then we were using wooden plows to like for farming no farmer complained that hey like we need fewer farmers now because steel plow is able to do it more effectively no one complained you actually had more farms and more productivity, more crop yields, and you're happier.

But isn't that just a regular tool as opposed to AI? Sure. AI is different. It's not overnight going to become something that's capable of just running an entire multi-trillion dollar company on its own. There are a lot of... Things that AIs cannot do. There's a lot of tacit knowledge in every company that AIs don't quite understand, and there's a lot of new directions that you can just start working on that AIs are not well-equipped to do because it doesn't have full knowledge about it, and the knowledge about it has yet to be captured, and some of that requires human-to-human work and collaboration.

so we obviously have to gravitate towards what is scarce when ai makes the current labor that's considered scarce because that's where the money is going in commodity then we have to gravitate towards what is scarce and the only way to do that is to seek things that we don't know about which is only something we can discover through our curiosity there's nothing else whatever we don't quite understand well whatever we don't know how to do well yet even with the current capabilities of AI that's where we should pull our labor and workforce into so it needs more responsible messaging and that's not quite happening right now I think it needs responsible messaging and then in the future what it needs is like real direction in terms of like letting people find their curiosity and find these paths of interest and find something to do with themselves that doesn't involve whatever their previous occupation that's irrelevant now.

That's true. I think passion for people is something that not a lot of people would be able to answer out of the box. If you go and ask them, what is your real passion? And the only thing they've known in life is to just climb up career ladders and make more money. That's going to actually take them a while to even discover. Right. Right. Which is why it's so important to get kids off on the right start. Yeah. That's the hope. That's our hope for the future is the kids. The kids are born curious. They don't need to change themselves to be curious. Right. The adults who probably already are like, because of this knowledge work thing, who kind of curb their curiosity and try to fit into the existing system.

It might be a little hard for them to adapt, but the kids, I think they don't have this problem. So I'm actually optimistic about the future long-term because the future is all centered around whoever is very young today.

that maybe the you know there's a lot of new projects to be done maybe some good leader actually wants to change the system and is willing to be patient about it like you know over a five to ten year horizon if you take ten years to actually like run majority of the government processes on AIs it may seem slow to you today but in the grand scheme of things it's actually good for the country and that's still going to need a lot of nice engineers to go work on these projects so they're not going to lose all their jobs there's going to be some displacement there's going to be some new projects there's going to be new priorities but it'll keep going The system will keep going because this is how historically things have been.

It's a weird world we're in right now. Yeah. It's never been weirder. That said, there's a lot of things that can still go wrong when you give so much power to specific companies, and they deploy all these bots, and then anybody can use them in weird ways. You don't even know if you're talking to a real person anymore. They're like people who just run AI responses and chat with like 500 people at once. And that's like a whole business. And so I think it's going to take a lot of adjustment.

Well, another piece of adjustment that a lot of people are coming to grips with is that this is a new part of our conversation in that in 2020, like when I first moved here, AI was never discussed. It was not a thing. I mean, we knew about it. We knew about AI. But it wasn't a huge part of the cultural discussion of what the future holds for us. Now it is. It is central, yeah. And in that short amount of time, in just six years, it really makes you wonder, because we know how technology progresses exponentially, what it's going to look like six years from now. Yeah, the 2028, like, you're definitely, my prediction is 2028 election debates are going to be largely about AI.

Wow. Yeah. AI, energy crisis, power, power. People are going to care about all these things. Because AI is no longer a thing that is new. It's part of all our lives. Everyone's using some form of AI in some ways. And it's not as dangerous as people thought. It's an amazing tool for, like, doing work and asking questions and learning things and all these things. When used correctly. Yeah. Yeah. It can also be used incorrectly. Like everything. Like everything. So it's far more powerful that incorrect usage can cause serious damage. Like, for example, kids who are using AIs for, like, companionship.

Right. Crazy things are happening there. Crazy things are happening there. Not good. Yeah, it's as dangerous or probably more dangerous than social media. And it's also scary that social media companies want to build more of these kind of companionship apps because they know that, okay, their only job is to get you engaged more, and that's the only way to sell more ads and make more money. And clearly companionship is a way to get you engaged more. Yeah. And so that's dangerous. if ads start being part of, like, AI chats. Yeah. Because then if that ends up working, then all these chatbots are just going to be sycophants that just tell you stuff that you want to hear.

It's also an indistinguishable facsimile to a real person. Like, they communicate like a real person. Right. So you really think you have a relationship with this. Right. Right, and it truly screws with your mind. It's hard to decouple, and it takes a lot of time to recover if you want to unplug. So the business model incentives are not well aligned to humanity. Did you see that AI companion that they developed that was at the Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas this year? Which one? It's like a hot Asian lady. I see. Yeah, these are the weird kind of projects that are going on. yeah it's a hot asian lady that talks to you yeah and you know she talks to you through ai and right now it's just a kind of a crude sort of robot but yeah you could see where it's going you can see where it's going ex machina yeah it's going yeah right there yeah yeah that movie was Amazing. Quite far ahead of its time. Really? Yeah. That was, that's one of my top 10 favorite movies of all time. It's underrated, actually, because people, like, reviews online say it's not as good, but I liked it. I loved it. Yeah. I thought it was fantastic. I like it better than Her. Yeah, Her, I lost Her after a while. I shut it off. Yeah. It lost my attention. I'm sure it's

good. It was the wrong time for me to watch it. Yeah. But Ex Machina, I've seen it like five times i fucking love that movie yeah it's just so i don't want to give anything away but it's it's so incredible and so bleak and so yeah in the relationship that he has with the hot one yeah yeah you believe it you're like i i'd be right there with him you know it's too confusing to our system to have something that looks exactly like the thing that you desire that is actually interested in you it just happens to be pulls all your data yeah yeah knows too much about you knows how to pull your strings yeah yeah but listen man very fascinating discussion yeah i'm glad we did it thank you so much and thanks for having an awesome platform perplexity has been great we really love using it here at the show it's it's made the show more interesting it's cool thank you it's very fulfilling because like we we want the app to be used by curious people like that like if we want to lift the ceiling of what our our our population can be you know not everyone and it's like fully curious all the time, but we're all born with it.

So at some point in time, the system curbs it from us. So there should be more apps that get us back to what we're naturally good at. It's a fascinating tool for technology or for curiosity rather, because it's seamless the way we use it on the show because there's always a question. Yeah. It comes up so often. Yeah. Throw it in perplexity. Let's find out what's up. Yeah. So it's been great for us. So thank you. Thank you. All right. My pleasure. Bye, everybody.