Try Pro free

The best 18 min of 61

Crusoe CEO Chase Lochmiller: Turning Stranded Energy Into Intelligence

Chase Lochmiller says Crusoe can scale AI by integrating power, data centers and cloud services while trusting experts to run each domain.

Training Data · Sonya Huang & Pat Grady

The best minutes

  1. 2:09A founder scales by growing alongside the companyPro pick 5 min
  2. 14:54Most startups fail through execution, not competitionPro pick 5 min
  3. 24:06Bitcoin mining bridged Crusoe to AI infrastructure8 min

Every moment plays free. PRO marks a write-up that's in Pro.

Also worth watching

  1. 7:09Cross-team alignment takes repeated communication4 min
  2. 37:16Companies can outgrow people who once fit their roles4 min
  3. 48:32CEOs need to actively seek out bad news2 min
  4. 32:30Coaching and practice can make a CEO a better communicator5 min
  5. 44:01Data centers need to explain their local impact3 min

Skip the energy portfolio rundown, the Everest summit account and Brian’s closing recap.

Full analysis · 6 min read

Real Alpha · Nov 7

Chase Lochmiller says ChatGPT brought AI demand in 2022

  • For Crusoe, Bitcoin monetized stranded gas while its energy-first thesis pointed toward AI.
  • Lochmiller says ChatGPT brought demand, but gives no sale price or project economics.
  • Boards should test power access, customer demand and local acceptance separately.

Free with an account

Read the rest of the analysis

6 sections, the 4 other voices it tests Lochmiller against, and what it means for you. Every episode we cut gets one.

Signed up before? The same buttons sign you in. The episode, its moments and the transcript stay free.

26:36

Crusoe’s energy thesis came before Bitcoin

Lochmiller says Crusoe’s energy-first computing idea came before its Bitcoin business. He says he had studied AI at Stanford and saw data and compute becoming constraints.

He frames the original move as bringing computing to underused power, rather than moving energy to a buyer. Bitcoin, in this telling, was an initial monetization route, not the strategy’s final destination.

The distinction matters because the interview offers a retrospective account from Crusoe’s CEO. That makes it useful evidence of his rationale, not independent proof of original intent. Nor does the story establish that every early investment directly advanced the AI business.

Boards can test continuity against dated plans, deployed assets and customer workloads. Those would show whether the early energy thesis shaped decisions before AI demand became obvious.

“bring the market to the energy”
26:50

Our read

The energy-first history is coherent, but this account is retrospective. Its value depends on whether power access becomes reliable AI capacity at acceptable cost.

27:35

Bitcoin mining monetized power, but did not prove AI economics

Crusoe’s first stranded resource was natural gas flared at oil sites without pipeline access. Lochmiller says the company brought modular generators and data centers onsite to use that gas.

That linked the location of power with a way to monetize computing. For example, he calls Bitcoin mining the easiest early way to turn energy into money.

Mining also gave Crusoe an operating business while the company experimented with AI clusters and customers. Lochmiller says the team tried different approaches and made mistakes before finding a market.

Yet mining’s load profile is not a direct proxy for AI infrastructure. He says mining can hold a flatter power draw, while AI use varies with workloads and cooling.

The two uses may share a power source without sharing operating requirements or customer value. The episode gives no site-level conversion costs, utilization, uptime or returns.

Our read

Mining demonstrated one way to bring computing to stranded power. It did not establish the economics, reliability or customer value of Crusoe’s AI cloud.

28:39

ChatGPT aligned Crusoe’s stack with new demand

Lochmiller places the demand inflection at ChatGPT’s launch on November 30, 2022. He says startups then wanted the compute, storage and networking Crusoe had been assembling.

Before that moment, he was calling university researchers to ask whether they could use GPUs powered in North Dakota. That history makes the AI effort look like a long option, not established product-market fit.

Demand helped make the earlier experiments relevant, but the show gives no customer count, contracted capacity or revenue. That distinction matters when a company describes patience as foresight after a market arrives.

Gorkem Yurtseven, fal’s co-founder and CTO, described another post-ChatGPT shift on Sourcery in November 2026. fal moved from Python infrastructure toward image models, with early revenue helping it commit.

That parallel shows timing can redirect a startup, but it does not validate Crusoe’s results. For Crusoe, the harder test is whether customers keep buying the capacity it has built.

“the magic moment was really the launch of ChatGPT.”
28:39

Our read

ChatGPT gives Lochmiller a clear demand marker, not proof of returns. fal’s different shift shows why customer evidence matters more than a pivot story.

31:24

Crusoe sold mining to protect AI focus

Lochmiller says Crusoe sold its Bitcoin business to NYDIG to concentrate capital, attention and people. He also said some investors could not invest while Crusoe remained tied to crypto.

The interview gives no sale price, Bitcoin cash contribution, AI margins or project costs. So the case he presents is strategic focus, not demonstrated financial superiority.

That is a real distinction for a board weighing a profitable business against a larger opportunity. Crusoe builds and operates AI infrastructure, and Lochmiller is explaining why the company chose to focus there.

The account gives his rationale, not an independent return comparison. Investor access constraints describe fundraising fit, but do not establish whether those assets were more valuable elsewhere.

Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, said on Big Technology Podcast in October 2026 that frontier research gets first claim on compute. He also said data centers take years to build, a capacity-planning point rather than validation of Crusoe’s allocation.

Google’s planning concern does not tell Crusoe’s board what the mining assets would earn under either use.

Our read

The sale may have simplified the business, but the episode cannot show whether it improved returns. Boards need the proceeds, costs and capacity gained to judge the trade.

22:01

Multiple energy choices still face local limits

Lochmiller says Crusoe pursues multiple power sources because no single solution fits every site. He lists natural gas, wind, solar, batteries, geothermal and hydropower, including behind-the-meter projects.

Take Iceland, where he points to geothermal power, hydropower, few residents and efficient cooling. That is a siting example, not a comparison of delivered costs or project schedules.

His account offers no site-specific water demand, emissions, power prices or community benefits. Those omissions matter because local acceptance is part of whether a planned site can proceed.

Lochmiller calls the industry’s problem a marketing one and says factual, respectful conversations can persuade residents. Andy Jassy, Amazon’s CEO, made a broader case on a16z Podcast in October 2026.

Jassy compared data-center water use with golf and almond farming. Sunil Rajaraman, Hamlet’s founder, described different local objections on MTS in October 2026, including water, noise and fire response.

Rajaraman’s examples show how concerns vary by community. Sectorwide comparisons cannot settle a particular site’s water, noise or emergency-response questions.

Our read

Local listening is a siting input, not merely a communications task. General comparisons cannot replace evidence about a specific project and its neighbors.

9:32

Vertical integration makes execution the next test

Integration is both the business logic and the execution burden in Lochmiller’s account. Crusoe spans energy generation, electrical equipment manufacturing, data centers and managed AI cloud.

Lochmiller says cross-team work is complicated and cites a weekly executive staff meeting for surfacing blockers. He also learned to repeat priorities after the company grew beyond the small-team stage.

That matters because the AI conversion depends on handoffs across power, facilities and cloud operations. An energy advantage can be lost if teams cannot deliver usable capacity on schedule.

He says Crusoe uses program management but still faces inherent tension between organizations. Neither the meeting cadence nor vertical integration itself proves speed, reliability or returns.

The episode offers no deployment milestones to settle that question. Crusoe’s ability to coordinate specialists is part of the strategy, but must be measured in delivered customer capacity.

Our read

The episode supports a coherent operating model, not proof of execution at scale. Integration is a thesis to measure, not a result to assume.

What it means for you

  1. Measure workload fit. For each candidate site, track workload variation, cooling needs and utilization separately. Lochmiller distinguishes Bitcoin’s steadier draw from AI’s changing demand.
  2. Compare asset economics. Put Bitcoin cash contribution, sale proceeds, capital needs and AI deployment costs in one comparison. The episode leaves those figures undisclosed, which is the gap to close.
  3. Map energy options. For each project, compare its chosen supply, cooling needs, delivery schedule and local impacts. Lochmiller says energy solutions vary by location, rather than offering one standard mix.
  4. Log community concerns. Record concerns by site, including water, noise, emergency response, taxes and schools. Compare residents’ reports with the company’s stated impacts before treating outreach as acceptance.

What to watch

  • Whether Crusoe provides project-level costs, utilization and customer demand that let outsiders test the AI conversion.
  • Whether the energy partnerships Lochmiller described become operating projects with measurable capacity and costs.
  • Whether local feedback changes project design, not only the company’s explanation of benefits.

Send this to the CFO and infrastructure lead comparing power and AI capacity plans.

28:39

Watch 28:39, where he links ChatGPT’s launch to new demand for Crusoe’s infrastructure.

Written by Real Alpha from the episode's transcript and the other moments it links, then checked against the transcript. Quotes are the speaker's exact words.

Minute by minute

  1. 0:00Crusoe spans energy through AI cloud

    Lochmiller describes Crusoe as a vertically integrated operation spanning power generation, data centers and managed AI cloud services. Its work ranges from large AI factories to small ones.

  2. 2:09Founder context helps leaders scale

    Lochmiller says a founder CEO has seen the business grow from its earliest days, so its current complexity does not arrive all at once. He says he can delegate to capable leaders because he has followed each stage of the journey and understands the company’s context.

  3. 7:18Cross-functional work needs repetition

    Lochmiller says he aligns teams on a direction, then holds leaders accountable for execution. Crusoe uses a weekly staff meeting to surface cross-team problems, and he says leaders must repeat priorities far more often as organizations grow.

  4. 11:13Urgency needs both pressure and purpose

    Lochmiller says Elon Musk balances the promise of changing the world with the pressure that a company could fail tomorrow. He aims to create urgency without going as far as Musk. Lochmiller says learning to lead a company of more than 2,000 employees took books, coaching, mistakes and on-the-job learning.

  5. 14:54Execution matters more than competition

    Lochmiller says startups are more likely to fail through poor execution, culture or focus than because a competitor defeats them. He sees AI infrastructure as a market with room for multiple winners and compares Crusoe’s integrated business to Exxon and Chevron, including its ability to partner with companies it may compete against elsewhere.

  6. 20:29Energy first shapes compute choices

    Lochmiller says Crusoe uses different energy sources for different locations and needs rather than expecting one solution to work everywhere. He cites natural gas, wind, solar, batteries, Icelandic geothermal and hydropower, Norwegian hydropower, and partnerships exploring nuclear power, including an SMR-powered AI factory at Idaho National Lab.

  7. 23:23Bitcoin mining was the first compute market

    Lochmiller says energy-first computing was Crusoe’s plan from the start, not a pivot. The company brought generators and data centers to flared gas in the Bakken and used Bitcoin mining as its first way to monetize the power. He says ChatGPT’s launch brought startups seeking the kind of AI compute infrastructure Crusoe had been developing.

  8. 30:06Crusoe sold mining to focus

    Lochmiller says selling the Bitcoin business to NYDIG let Crusoe direct more capital, resources and attention to AI infrastructure. He also says some investors could not invest in businesses tied to crypto, which made the company’s story more complicated. He remains personally supportive of Bitcoin.

  9. 32:30Coaching helped build speaking skills

    Lochmiller says public speaking did not come naturally and improved through preparation and practice, with coaching from Shane Metcalf. He praises Felicis for budgeting for executive coaching and other personal development. He says a coach can help a CEO see blind spots and navigate people problems.

  10. 37:27Lochmiller says CEOs fire too slowly

    Lochmiller says CEOs usually wait too long to fire someone, even when they have been considering it for a while. He argues that people may not grow at the same rate as a company; someone suited to a role today may not fit when the business is 10 times bigger two years later.

  11. 42:34Shared work connects researchers and welders

    Lochmiller says Crusoe’s culture depends on people with different expertise learning from one another. He says electricians have contributed innovations that researchers can use, and that the company’s work spans the system from electrons to AI tokens.

  12. 44:01Lochmiller says data centers have a marketing problem

    Lochmiller says the industry has not explained the facts about data centers well enough. Crusoe meets with local officials and communities to discuss impacts and benefits, and he says the company has increased security. He also says CEOs should seek bad news and frontline feedback rather than relying on good news.

  13. 50:44Lochmiller reduced Everest icefall exposure

    After an avalanche killed 15 Sherpas in the Khumbu Icefall in 2014, Lochmiller says he and his climbing partner changed their acclimatization plan for his 2018 summit. They trained on nearby mountains and made four passes through the icefall instead of the eight typical of a commercially guided expedition. He says he nearly turned back at the Balcony before continuing to the summit.

Published Oct 29, 2026.

Transcript · 47 min read

Training Data, hosted by Sonya Huang and Pat Grady, with Chase Lochmiller.

Transcribed by machine (Whisper) from the episode’s audio, so a word may be off here and there.

  1. and then building and operating a managed AI cloud platform with managed AI services. What's made me very scalable as a leader is that we have these critical areas of domain expertise where I can move around and I can go very deep with any individual, but I trust them a lot to be making the right decisions as we're sort of scaling things. And everybody has a broad perspective of what we're doing at the macro scale and how each individual leader contributes to that vertically integrated AI infrastructure platform that we're building here at Crusoe. okay everybody today we have on chase lockmiller grusso's building so many of the data centers that power the age of intelligence. He's a very professional CEO, and he talks all about the road from zero beginnings to a $31 billion valuation that he just closed. He gets into the nuts and bolts of scaling a very operationally intensive business. I think you're going to like it.

  2. Chase, welcome to The Long Strange Trip. Brian, thanks for having me. We call this The Long Strange Trip because my journey as a CEO was a very long, strange trip kind of tracking your career you've had a long maybe not strange but interesting trip like you were on track to become a professor you became a hedge fund trader you became a mountaineer climbing mount everest among other things you're kind of an energy entrepreneur at least through my lens when you first got going and now you're the world's best data center builder Is there a through line in all of this, Chase? As a person, I've always been attracted to trying to solve hard problems.

  3. I think that's been the through line of my career, take on big challenges, solve hard problems that are exciting and inspiring to me.

Read the whole transcript
  1. Chase Lochmiller · 5 min

    “you have to continually be upping your game. You have to be continually investing in yourself to be able to scale.”

  2. Chase Lochmiller · 4 min

    “as soon as I'm sort of getting sick of hearing myself say something, then we're just scratching the surface”

  3. to succeed in today's business age.

  4. Yeah, your business is such that you have to go fast. Like, you can't take your time. Most CEOs complain that as they get bigger, they slow down. Have you figured out ways to keep the pace up or have you slowed down? I mean, it feels faster and crazier than it's ever been. like at Caruso, there's a lot of big things happening, uh, on a daily basis. So I, I, I would say we are, we are continuing to move with incredible urgency. You know, I, I think Elon's probably like the best in the world at this, but like, you know, just trying to eliminate any sense of like entitlement or, uh, you know, eliminate any sense of like, Hey, just, you should be comfortable, like we made it, like we're here, now we just have to coast.

  5. Elon has this superpower of, you know, simultaneously enabling people to believe that if they're successful, they're going to change the world and there will be this incredible financial outcome and this incredible outcome that's driving massive impact, uh, while also holding people accountable through the high pressure of like, we're going to go out of business tomorrow. And if you don't act within, you know, the, the greatest degree of urgency that you're physically capable of, we're going to, we're going to die. And you know, that, like holding that tension is, is, is quite a, quite a superpower. Um, I would say that I'm not quite as extreme as Elon in driving this tension of, we're going to go out of business tomorrow versus, hey, the opportunity we have to change the world should inspire you to work hard.

  6. But I do think that threading the needle of that is an incredibly important thing to be able to drive a large organization to move quickly and with a high degree of urgency. Okay. It was the first time running a company like this. Do you study other CEOs and try to borrow pieces of their playbook? And is Elon your guy? You're trying to borrow big pieces? Who do you look up to? It's kind of funny. Crusoe is now the largest company I've ever worked for. And, you know, we recently surpassed 2000 employees. And, you know, I used to read a ton of books across fiction, nonfiction, you know, kind of whatever I was interested in sort of a wide ranging things from, you know, science fiction and, you know, technical books to, you know, novels and, you know, whatever the latest and greatest, you know, economist book was.

  7. but uh i shifted when i started crusoe there was like a period where i just binged on like every you know every good business book recommendation anybody would give me i would like you know binge those things and i got to you know i had the fortune of having a number of great mentors i had a great coach um that that really helped me grow into becoming a leader of of people because i'd never really been a leader of a big organization before starting crusoe either and so So it definitely took work. It took effort to get to where I'm at in terms of what does it take to be a good manager. And it took making mistakes and failing and learning on the job and just going on my own personal journey and my own personal path to embed a lot of scar tissue that I could then leverage in the future.

  8. I do think that there are certainly mentors and people that I look up to that I have closer relationships with. I do very much look up to guys like Elon that, you know, I think is just one of the greatest entrepreneurs and greatest business builders and, you know, greatest visionaries that, you know, humanity's ever, ever had. If you don't mind, like what were some of

  9. Chase Lochmiller · 5 min

    “most startups die from suicide, not from homicide. It's not other businesses that kill you.”

  10. weird to you? Yeah, please. In addition to my Sequoia work, I started an ocean fund called propeller and i heard a pitch yesterday from a company and i'm

  11. not sure about this company, but, or about this industry, is mining, you know, rare earth metals from the ocean. And same analogy, like we're going to do it end to end, we're going to build an Exxon was the exact same company that they talked about as a super vertically integrated version. Speaking of that, we invested in Blue Energy. And I know, you know, Jake from Blue Energy, building nuclear in the ocean uh you talk about that like you're you've had a kind of a journey with the energy office it seems like you started in just like there's there's wasted energy out there and we're going to put it to work and you're still doing it but it sounds like the abilene facility is a lot of just natural gas like where are you at this point you know crusoe is very focused on activating megawatts for intelligence. And that requires all sorts of energy resources and all sorts of different use cases. At times, it's natural gas. We're focused on trying to find and catalyze innovative new energy solutions that can be things like Blue Energy. They're trying out new nuclear energy production technologies. We have another partnership with Ollo that we announced recently, where we're trying to bring to life the first

  12. SMR-powered AI factory at the Idaho National Lab. We've done stuff with behind-the-meter wind, with behind-the-meter gas, with behind-the-meter solar, with batteries. We've tried many different things. We've gone to Iceland, where Iceland's this geological phenomenon that it exists, but it's this land of fire and ice where you have very abundant, low-cost geothermal energy, very low-cost hydropower and not a lot of people and very cheap, efficient cooling. And bringing the demand for power there via compute has been our philosophy. And that's really what we mean when we say take an energy-first approach to building compute infrastructure.

  13. Norway is another great market for us where they have a lot of low-cost hydropower that's you know, being underutilized and can be built bigger than it is today. And so we don't think it's a silver bullet. We think compute infrastructure will be ubiquitous to serve the infrastructure layer of intelligence that's ultimately going to power global economic development. And so you need to use different energy solutions in different cases. And so we're really excited about a lot of the innovation taking place in the industry. And Blue Energy is another great example of can we leverage the same steam turbine technology that is needed for gas generation to basically – that's needed for both gas generation and nuclear energy to be a sort of bridge between gas and baseload firm nuclear power.

  14. You know, all of these things we think are great. We think a lot of the development in new battery technology is really exciting. Everything from like, you know, what's happening with companies like Redwood Materials that are repurposing used electric vehicle batteries and used lithium ion batteries to long duration storage solutions like Form Energy and Intora that we think will be cost effective 100 hour batteries. And so there's like a spectrum of whole different things and we kind of view it as like we sort of need them all. The demand from intelligence for energy is voracious and it's really going to accelerate the human progress as it has more access to energy.

  15. one of the things i find fascinating about you and your company is you started essentially in the bitcoin mining industry with stranded uh energy putting that to work and it was a really good business you were cranking with it and it sounds like from the beginning you sort of foresaw there's going to be a need for ai infrastructure and you started building it out and it rhymed at some point you decided we're going to sell off this most of our business is this bitcoin mining business when did you make that decision how did you tell your board take us behind the scenes on when that became a good idea in your head i was that was a bold move

  16. Chase Lochmiller · 8 min

    “this was sort of the plan all along was this energy first approach to computing.”

  17. personally a huge bitcoin supporter and holder and you know i think it's an important thing to exist for the world as a you know non-state controlled decentralized digitally native open monetary ecosystem but it was the right thing for crusoe to go all in on ai infrastructure

  18. Chase Lochmiller · 5 min

    “public speaking was never something that came naturally to me. It was something I had to work really, really hard at”

  19. Chase Lochmiller · 4 min

    “the crux of it is something along the lines of, you know, people scale linearly companies scale exponentially.”

  20. of my recent interviews i interviewed ali gozi from uh databricks love him great guy and he's basically had the same management team for 10 years with the separately turned over one person And then Devit Tacharya is a friend of mine and coming on the pod. On average, he turned over two per year on the exec team for lots of reasons. I find that odd. They're in kind of similar businesses and it's just so, and they're both really good and they're so different. Totally. Actually, my current COOs and CFO worked alongside Dave at MongoDB for about a decade. So he wasn't one of the people that was, you know, churned.

  21. By churn, I mean, some of them leave. No, I totally understand. But look, I don't think there's any right answer. And, you know, I've seen different things work. I think what I've found most effective for me is that if you have someone that's really struggling, the team recognizes it. And, you know, we view it as, you know, the team is ultimately there to win. And, you know, I mean, I saw this, I grew up playing competitive sports and, you know, if you, if you run a team, you always loved your teammates, you know, you had. It's a strong and special bond that like came from, you know, the locker room down the field.

  22. And, you know, if you had a teammate that was just like struggling or, you know, a weak link and, you know, led to, you know, the team's downfall, you know, it was like you, you knew that the right thing to do was to replace that person with someone. It sounds like you're in the middle of those two. I'm in the middle of the two for sure. Fine. Yeah. Speaking of teams and people, one thing that is fascinating about your business, and I just think about the culture we built at HubSpot, people rhymed at HubSpot. But in your organization, you have AI researchers and you have welders. How do you create a culture across all of them?

  23. Are they different cultures? How do you comp people across all of it? How does all that work? It's a great question. We've always felt like we've had an incredibly diverse culture just from the people that are coming to help build this. And one of our core values is tapping into the collective genius, right? It's like no one person has all the domain expertise to deliver the full solution that we're trying to bring to bear. And we all can learn from one another. And all of us working together towards a cohesive solution is going to result in an amplified result that none of us could have done individually. And there have been critical innovations that people have gotten from people like electricians that are working on wiring things up to the researchers are then benefiting from those specific use cases. And how we think about the whole building management system, how we think about the operating system from the electron to the token, I think is something that really sets us apart. I read an article in the journal about VCs and people in your industry when they're presenting at conferences, like people are

  24. Chase Lochmiller · 3 min

    “what the data center industry, like their biggest problem is we have a marketing problem.”

  25. given there's, there's, you know, crazy people out there that, uh, want to, want to, want to create a big statement. So, uh, yeah. Yeah. Um, and so I assume some of these rooms you're walking into, there's some hysterical people. What is that like the first room you walk into and people are screaming and yelling at you? Like, there's no training for that. Again, I think honestly, like appealing to, you know, their humanity and like understanding why someone may be, you know saying what they're saying i think listening to the facts i think like you know i often have very strong opinions but i can always change them in light of new information and new facts so like that's like uh i think it's important to have that like intellectual flexibility to say like hey i had high conviction that we're doing things the right way upon learning this new thing we should probably be doing this differently and we could probably be doing this better and i think like that is like an inherent growth mindset that we have here as a company. And, you know, I've tried to channel as a leader, like to, you know, have, uh, you know, the, the ability to listen to, you know, these, these, these, these criticisms and, and, and, uh, you know, try to

  26. try to filter out like what is crazed hysteria that's, you know, unfounded in truth and what's like legitimate critical feedback that we should, you know, be using to become a better steward of,

  27. Chase Lochmiller · 2 min

    “I care way less about the good news than I do about the bad news.”

  28. problems and, you know, go try to, you know, help, help resolve them. Okay. This question's for me. And I would imagine other people are interested. I've never met someone that climbed Mount Everest and I'm really impressed. What is it like? What is the training like? What does it feel like when you get to the top of that mountain?

  29. You know, in a lot of ways, like a company culture is sort of a reflection of, you know, the CEO or the founder's culture. And, you know, that's really what's happening at Crusoe. Like we actually have a core company value to think like a mountaineer, which is like this sense of cultural resilience and preparation and planning and willingness to endure the expedition, a lot of that value and the practices that we've written about for that value describe a lot of what it's like to climb Mount Everest. And so there's actually this whole internal presentation I have around the various Everest trips that I had, because I actually tried to climb Mount Everest once in 2014, and there was a big avalanche that occurred, and it ended up killing 15 Sherpas in the Khumbu Icefall. And I made sort of this conscious decision like you know i came back and my wife was like oh thank god like that chapter is done and like you don't have to do this anymore and i was like look this thing like haunts me and like it's all i think about and like i like have to go back she's like you're insane um but like if you're gonna do that please do it before we have kids um So, uh, but when I thought about that, it was like very much like when you think about

  30. Mount Everest, you know, and, and I climbed on the South side, which is, you know, the Nepal side, uh, through the Kumbu Valley, there's this, you know, you, you basically start at base camp and then, or you trek up to base camp and then you go from base camp to camp one. And then there's camp two, camp three, camp four. And then you, you have this push to the summit. Well, the two most dangerous areas on the mountain are basically from camp four to the summit, which is, which is frequently referred to as the death zone. This is where you're above 8,000 meters. So, you know, very intuitive why that's dangerous. You're at very, very high altitude where humans really shouldn't be living. Um, but the other most dangerous area is this area between base camp and camp one, which is called the Khumbu Icefall. So this was the area where, uh, you know, this disaster occurred when I was there in 2014. And, uh, the thing about the Khumbu Icefall is that, you know, it's, it's a glacier that's sort of falling, right? So it's this beautiful, like really cool ice jungle gym, but there's a lot of things that are just like stochastic risk, right? It's like these things that are totally outside of your control where

  31. it's like a Ciroc falls or an avalanche occurs and, you know, oops, you die. And that was the type of risk where I was like, look, I know there are ways I can consciously train and prepare for the high elevation and, you know, I can manage my risk up there like more effectively. And I know consciously I'm taking that risk. The risk I felt less comfortable with was this stochastic risk and a traditional Everest expedition involves going from base camp to camp one. And you're, you actually acclimatize on the mountains. You go base camp, camp one, back to base camp, base camp, camp one, camp two, back to base camp, up to camp three, back to base camp.

  32. and you actually end up doing eight trips through the Khumbu Icefall. So like four round trips on a typical commercially guided expedition. In order to de-risk that, me and my climbing partner actually designed a different approach to climbing Everest, which was we ended up going and climbing a bunch of mountains nearby and spending a lot of time at the summits of those mountains so that we would acclimatize without taking this stochastic risk in the Khumbu Icefall. And we actually only did one big acclimatization trip up Mount Everest and then back to base camp. So we ended up doing basically four passes through the Khumbu Icefall instead of eight. I was conscious of the risks that I wanted to take. Um, you know, the planning.

  33. preparation, all that, we had to think through a ton of stuff, a lot of training, a lot of long distance trail running and a couple of different high altitude training trips. But the point I want to get across is conscious risk-taking and intense planning and preparation that really went into a very successful Everest summit in 2018. You worked so hard at it and you wanted it so badly. What was the feeling inside of you when you got to the top? It was like, because I almost turned around at this, uh, this area called the balcony, it's about 8,600 meters. Um, so the summit's 8848. Um, and, and so, you know, not too far from the summit in terms of elevation, but like it felt impossibly far and it was still dark out. Right. So we left camp four at like 11 PM. It was dark out when we got to the balcony. My, you know, you feel terrible. Like, you know, I hadn't eaten much in the last 48 hours. Like I was dehydrated. I felt awful. My legs were cramping like, and it was dark. Right. And you know, my partner was really the person who inspired me to continue. I, I, like I felt fine apart from those things. So it wasn't like, felt like I was putting myself at risk. And once, once the sun came up and you start seeing the sunrise and you're,

  34. you're sort of high up in this mountain, you're like, you're just inspired by, you know, your surroundings. You're, you know, it was this elevation of your spirits and, uh, gave you the adrenaline to kind of like make the push through that final, uh, you know, 250 meters. And, uh, you know, when I got to the summit, I think, you know, my feeling was, was really one of just sheer awe, just like, you know, just a, a sense of awe for the universe and, you know, an offer, you know, this, you know, being on the summit and sort of experiencing, you know, the whole, the whole world around me, um, you know, I think, I think was just a really special one and it makes you feel small. Right. And, uh, you know, I think, I think there's something, uh, very interesting about like, you know, having that sense of like, I'm small and I'm inspired by the world around me and just like the magnificence of existence. And, uh, you know, that was kind of my, my experience on the summit. We, it was beautiful. We had about, we had a very sunny day. So we spent about an hour, uh, up at the summit and, you know, just took a bunch of pictures.

  35. just really enjoyed this heroic moment of achievement. Congratulations on all your success. I'm rooting for you. You're a fantastic CEO. Thanks for coming on. Brian, thanks for having me. This was really fun. Okay, hope you liked that episode with Chase. He is a very legit CEO scaling that business really well. I'll give you a couple of my takeaways. My first takeaway is kind of on him as a homo sapien. And he's a person who really likes hard challenges. And like when I recruit and I fund CEOs, that's definitely a quality that I look for. I liked how he talked about just how much the CEO job changed.

  36. He had never done anything like that before. He's eight years into the journey. And man, he's a learning machine. He read a lot about it. He hired a coach. It sounds like his coach was really useful. And I coach a bunch of Sequoia CEOs. and you know some of it is giving them advice but a lot of it is gaining context and listening to the problems and empathizing and really kind of being like a therapist so he benefited a lot from that the other thing he worked hard on it sounds like his public speaking he's very smooth like really articulate and smooth and sounds like that wasn't his default setting he's had to really work at that and i think that's important like if you're up in front of your company you're up in front of investors. I don't think it hurts to be articulate and smooth. I like the way he talked about competition. He said something we used to say at HubSpot all the time, you're much more likely to die of suicide than murder. It was very much our case. It sounds to me he's really into competition. And I think a lot of founders frown on that. We had major competition over many, many years with Salesforce.com. So I wouldn't shy away from that. The other thing I always did is I

  37. always got to know our competitors, just because you never know. And so don't don't be afraid to reach out to your competitors and have coffee. The last thing I took that I really liked is as the organization gets bigger, and I felt this at HubSpot, everyone wants to give you good news, you're the CEO, and they expect you want to hear good news. And you really want the opposite, you want to hear the bad news. And you want to train the organization to give you that bad news. So almost encouraging people when they push back at you and when they give you bad news inside of a. You know, a pretty good size setting. I think that's a really important quality in CEOs.

  38. The other thing that I think is an important CEO quality that I think he does, and you might too, but he has very strong opinions, as you've heard. But if the facts change, he's willing to change his mind. And being stubborn is a really tough quality in a CEO. It makes you quite hard to follow. Anyway, those are some of my takeaways. I thought he was great. It's an amazing business. he's an amazing CEO I hope you liked it and I'll see you next time on a strange trip

More interviews