Free with a sign-in.
The best 8 min of 22
Aidan Gomez Unfiltered on AGI, China & AI's Biggest Risk
Aidan Gomez argues that AI's biggest risk is dependence on a few providers, while enterprise adoption still has room to expand.
NPNewcomer Pod · Eric Newcomer
- Aidan Gomez is a Cohere co-founder and Transformer co-author.
The best minutes
- 11:35Democratic countries need sovereign AI for resilience3 min
- 3:18Enterprise AI use can grow far beyond codingPro pick 3 min
- 18:25AI agents may displace workers more than past technologies3 min
Also worth watching
- 6:08Self-hosting open models can cost more than it appears4 min
- 15:15Chinese models are progressing beyond distillation3 min
- 0:32Transformers persist by absorbing ideas from other architectures3 min
Skip the opening teaser and the closing subscribe message.
Summary · 3 min read
Aidan Gomez is a Cohere co-founder and co-author of the Transformer paper Attention Is All You Need. He says Cohere builds its own models and offers customers customization and deployment on their own infrastructure.
Aidan Gomez argues that dependence on a small number of AI providers creates a resilience risk for democracies, especially when critical infrastructure relies on services that can be switched off. He says current models qualify as AGI in many respects, while enterprise adoption remains early and model costs should fall as efficiency improves. He expects custom, sovereign deployments to matter more than competing only at the frontier, and says Chinese models are already highly capable even if the US remains ahead. He expects agents to move beyond software development but says their effect on employment remains uncertain.
A Pro write-up, open to you here. Try Pro free for 7 days
A Pro write-up. The rest of the summary and the minute by minute are in Real Alpha Pro; the episode, its moments and the transcript stay free.
Read it with Pro, 7 days freeMinute by minute
- 0:00Too few providers create resilience risks
Gomez warns that a small pool of large technology companies is becoming a single point of failure for democracies. He says computer engineers are taught to avoid that kind of system.
- 0:32The Transformer remains the platform
Gomez says the Transformer was built for a narrow translation task, and he is surprised it remains the foundation nearly 10 years later. He says it absorbed ideas from SSMs and expects innovation to continue above the architecture. Asked if we have AGI, he says yes in many respects because models can exceed human capabilities on many problems.
- 3:18Enterprise AI has room to grow
Gomez describes an adoption cycle: companies first encourage unrestricted use, then constrain budgets, while model makers improve efficiency. He expects costs to fall and lower costs to unlock more use; he estimates another 10 or 100x in enterprise token consumption beyond coding. In finance, he sees potential for automated decisions, communication, coordination, regulatory and compliance work.
- 6:08Open source can cost more to run
Gomez says open-source models may look cheaper by token price, but self-hosting adds infrastructure, software maintenance and the burden of updating the system as models change. He says customers also need to consider whether they are comfortable sending data to those providers, and compares operating an open-source model to self-hosting a database.
- 8:03Tailored models can beat frontier scale
Gomez says Cohere builds its own models because customers want lower costs, sovereignty and customization, and the market—not model capability—is often the bottleneck. He says he is not trying to compete at the frontier. He estimates models are good enough for 90 percent of what enterprises want to do, while the remaining 10 percent remains difficult and valuable.
- 11:35Critical workloads need sovereign infrastructure
Gomez says democratic countries have consolidated technology purchases among a small group of providers, which creates a single point of failure. For critical workloads, he argues countries should control the infrastructure they depend on. He says Cohere's planned Toronto-Berlin dual headquarters and its partnership with Aleph Alpha are part of building capability across democracies, not just two countries.
- 15:15Access restrictions expose foreign dependence
Discussing recent US restrictions on AI access, Gomez says the episode was the scenario Cohere had warned about. He argues that the US is pursuing its own interests, but other countries could lose access if they build critical infrastructure on services they do not control.
- 16:57Gomez sees Chinese models as highly capable
Gomez expects the US to continue leading in capability, but says Chinese models are extraordinarily capable and well-resourced by their government. He says distillation may have played a part, but Chinese companies are increasingly developing models independently and are on a strong trajectory.
- 18:25Agents could reshape work and employment
Gomez expects agents to move from software development into other enterprise fields, where developers already work with models as collaborators. He is unsure whether rising demand will offset displacement and says society should plan for that possibility, with options including retraining, UBI and jobs-guarantee programs.
Published Jun 26, 2026.
Transcript · 16 min read
Newcomer Pod, hosted by Eric Newcomer, with Aidan Gomez.
Transcribed by machine (Whisper) from the episode’s audio, so a word may be off here and there.
A very small pool of these large tech players are becoming a single point of failure for the entire democratic block. That is not a resilient system, right? That is a single point of failure. And the first thing you learn as a computer scientist or engineer is don't build a single point of failure. Are we at AGI today? I mean, in many respects, yes. In reality, I think it's actually quite expensive to adopt open source models. I'm Eric Newcomer, author of the Newcomer Substack. Let's get into it.
“and then the Transformer just copied those ideas, integrated it into the architecture, and we still call it the Transformer.”
I mean, in many respects, yes, right? Like, I think definitely. It's a general artificial intelligence. And it seems like whatever problem we point it towards, we can basically exceed human capabilities in that problem.
Read the whole transcript
“And so there's probably another 10 or 100x in terms of token consumption just on the enterprise side.”
“In reality, I think it's actually quite expensive to adopt open source models, and it looks cheap.”
looking for a customized, bespoke model. I interviewed Ali Goetze at Databricks a week or so ago for the newsletter. He told a story about how he got in the model business. They said they spent $10 million on a training run. Really, the whole cluster cost them $20 million.
And then three months later, the whole thing they'd built wasn't worth anything. And his view is basically that unlike software, which slowly loses its value, even if you have out-of-date software, your customers take a while to figure that out. Models, they switch to the next thing. It sounds like you're offering a view that older models still have a lot of value like years out or you disagree with that point of view. What keeps customers using sort of a year old model? Well, when was DBRX trained? It was like two years ago. Yeah, this was 2024. So he left this a long time ago. This was sort of a reflection.
So when you're on this like super steep part of the capability curve and like when you're in a period where models aren't very good at anything, yeah, you'll feel that, right? because it's increasing super fast but the reality is models have sort of gotten good enough at so like 90 percent of what an enterprise wants to do that last 10 is still super valuable i'm not trying to discount that and there's like uh i don't know a decade plus of technical work to go do to solve that that 10 but the idea that um models change every three months and it's like some huge groundbreaking thing it's just not true anymore for the vast majority of what the market wants to do it is true at the very fringe right the frontier like in the pure sciences yes you can have a material breakthrough where the model from six months ago couldn't do it and the model now can like solving air dose problems or what you know protein folding whatever but a lot of the thesis there's a lot of value today to be and people just need to figure out how to extract it
“And the first thing you learn as a computer scientist or engineer is don't build a single point of failure.”
So really, you know, once that deal is complete, it'll be Canada and Germany. I call Britain home. My mom's British. I live here. And that partnership between Canada and Germany, it was never meant to be just two countries. We want to build this alliance to help create capability beyond just one democracy, right? Like the thing that I said at the G7 was, it is the case we have a democracy leading in AI right now. That's fantastic. But democracies need to occupy position one, two, three, four, et cetera, and that's not true.
And so I think it's essential that middle powers, or whatever you want to call it, come together to develop these capabilities for the good of the democratic project.
“Like, I think they are extraordinarily capable, extraordinarily well-resourced by their government, and only getting more resources.”
“We have something now that looks so much more like us that maybe it is more displacing.”
This is the Newcomer Podcast where we chop it up on all things Silicon Valley. Thanks for watching. Please like, comment, subscribe. Go read the Newcomer Substack if you want to get really in the weeds and understand the real business of venture capital and startups at newcomer.co.
You still yearn for podcasts. I've got the Cerebral Valley Show with Max Schout and James Wilsterman. Otherwise, probably see you in about a week. Thanks for all your support.


