2026 Predictions with Dan Ives and Chris Verrone | The Real Eisman Playbook Episode 40

Oh, my God. It's like, you know, it's funny. Like, you know, doing this since, like, late 90s, you know, there have been certain years where they're just you know that you feel like they're just much more crazy than others i think this is like a top two or three crazy year that i've had my career part of it goes back to like on one hand the ai revolution were it's year three of a 10-year build-out cap backs you start off in the beginning of the year everyone's that go to the deep seek moment which ultimately ended up really being essentially fit you know you got to add two commas to what they spend and those are essentially stolen NVIDIA chips.

But the reality is that... Say that again. I don't think everybody's aware of that. If you go back to DeepSea, because a lot of times people be like, how come no one talks DeepSea? Because instead of spending $6 million, they were spending $600 million in reality. and the chips they were using were essentially stolen NVIDIA chips through Singapore. I mean, that's the reality, right? So when everyone's like, how could DeepSeek do it with two matches, a dollar, and like a bag of McDonald's? And a tent. And why would these companies be spending $300 billion? I'm like, dude, that's because that's a Cinderella story.

I mean, if you want to believe that. So I think the thing is that took time to manifest. Big tech then had a double down, CapEx, Nadella, Davos, we're good for our $80 billion, the whole thing. Then obviously, like, the spending, I mean, the spending was, you know, I'd say probably 20%, 30% more than we expected. You go to Liberation Day, I'd say the same thing. That was probably, like, maybe a handful of times in my career, that was, like, a moment of, like, potentially economic Armageddon, just because knowing that that was going to cut the tech trade at its knees. And for the first time in 30 years, the U.S. is ahead of China when it comes to tech.

And that was almost like an emotional time because for me, so many times you're in Taiwan, China, see 18 hours in a fab, all the innovation technology. Land in Newark Airport, there's a fistfight, the Dunkin' Donuts, and then you're like, dude, there's a reason how far behind we are. The reality is first time we're ahead in terms of U.S. tech, circular financing, going from good to bad. Google New York City cab drivers bearish on the stock going into this year. Oracle good, Oracle bad. It's the only MAG 7 stock actually outperforming the S&P this year. I believe it's Google. But go back. If we sit here a year.

By a lot. By a big number. It's up over 60%. Yep. Remember a year ago, they're going to get broken up by DOJ. Better chance of me playing for the Knicks. Then the reality is like AI. I wouldn't go that far. You never. Impossible. Who knows? Then all of a sudden AI eating their lunch. search is going to be done. They're behind. Now you look at Gemini. So it's get the popcorn out. It's going to be, you know, obviously a lot of ups and downs. So right now, what would you say are when you're talking to investors on the tech trade, what are the big concerns that you're hearing from people? The big concerns and, you know, and you hit on some of them, but the big concern is just, you know, the spending's there, the capex is there. The question is like, when's monetization of AI going to happen? Is it going to be quick enough that investors are not going to be like, white flag, you got to stop spending and become self-filling profits?

The data center build out, the OpenAI, too big to fail trade, is that almost like a centerpiece? Are they good for their bills or whatever? And that's why I think the reality is like it's easy to get fearful if you're in the 30th floor of a New York City office building or Metro North. But for someone like myself, three and a half million air miles in the last 25 years, seeing it front and center, you have a much different view in demand and supply for NVIDIA chips are 12 to 1 in Taiwan. on. And Dan, I think two things can be true at the same time, right? Some of these stocks that had remarkable runs over the last couple of years can have 20, 30, 40% drawdowns, and everything you're saying could still be true. And I think we need to separate that a little bit. Oh, I totally agree.

You know, there are some names that I would say are on the periphery of the AI story, which were once viewed as AI darlings, which actually, as you know, Steve, have not made any progress now all year. I'm thinking of a name like Eaton, right? That was viewed as very much in this infrastructure build out um it was up sharply off the april lows but it's actually point to point unchanged i think april of 24 right that's a long time for something that you would consider one of these darlings to be uninvolved well the problem with eating just a little pushback is they have other businesses of course and so it's it's not as pure an ai trade they've got legacy businesses that aren't doing as well but when they were viewed as part of that ai trade all right and to your point part of the problem too is that just because you say ai 30 times in a conference call. It doesn't make you an AI player. So investors, too, is trying to decipher who are the winners, who are the frauds, the fake ones, and I think that's the other thing.

So let me push back a little bit on the AI trade because I'm pushing back more academically than

And I think also you – I think you do particularly an awesome job where sometimes like from a macro and summarizing it in a way that also – it also dovetails into a lot of the themes too. Well, like what are the super themes, right? So we could look at this move in commodities and you could come up with three very different answers.

By the way, I was watching CNBC today and they were talking commodities and the commentator was – all he was talking about was that this is a contrafear currency trade. Like the basement of the dollar by commodities and with absolutely nothing about AI involved. So let's think about why here for a moment. So you could say commodities are turning up here because there's some cyclical signal. The real economy is getting better. I'm OK with that answer. You could say commodities are turning up here because we're in this geopolitical resource nationalism. OK, that sounds reasonable as well. You could say commodities are turning up here because of this debasement trade.

Maybe, maybe not. You could say they're turning up here because they're the raw material necessary for a lot of the stuff that you focus on, Dan. And I don't particularly care which is the correct answer. I think the stocks are blunt instruments. Any one of those could be right. I don't think Rio or BHP or Freeport is going to distinguish what is the correct reason why. Do you view like Rio as like an AI, like a third, fourth – You're talking Rio Tinto. Yeah, do you view like some of those as like third, fourth derivative AI trades? Yeah, I do. And I think you could actually start to view some of the energies in that – that capacity as well. I had a fascinating conversation last week with a gentleman who's one of the biggest players in the physical delivery crude world. Of crude? Of crude.

And I was pressing him a little bit on, you know, help me understand why the oil chart looks so bad, but actually the E&P names are all getting better. And he's like, well, it's simple. AI is making the geological survey so good that the breakeven of crude is falling. So that's good for the stocks not bet for the stocks so you know there's this really yeah so you know that's crazy and i think dan like you know maybe 2.0 or 3.0 here if we're talking about a general purpose technology the the winners of ai are who all the benefits accrue to of course and that's probably what's on the come here then there's a whole trade about like you see my whole view is like like our whole thing is like in our lives etf which is like the second third fourth derivatives of AI, because it's not just about, in 2020, 2024, it's like, own a godfather of AI, Jensen, own a video, Microsoft, Palantir. Now it's about how do you play the derivatives, infrastructure, Nebius, some other names like that. So give us some derivative trades that you're focusing on now. I mean, to me, like derivatives, first off, like in software and Palantir being our number one. But I think I look at names like Snowflake and MongoDB that are really the use case software

names. As these use cases get deployed on the enterprise, I think there's going to be huge plays. The protection of it, I think the area that's getting overlooked is cybersecurity. I look at CrowdStrike, Palo Alto as huge derivative trades on the cybersecurity side of the AI piece. And then from an infrastructure perspective, like Nebius is a name that we're super bullish on, you know iron iron i-r-e-n in terms of a name that's a power play it's also on crypto but that's a name i think's going to be a data center power play g vernova is one of our favorites i mean we're we're now at a point now where it's like all we're doing we're trying to spend our time figuring out whether it's the microns wearing semis wearing software to to play the the ai revolution chris what are you thinking you know it's funny when i look at what we've in our own etf um it's kind of evolved from the traditional pure play ai stocks again to more of the derivatives could banks be a derivative here of right like when you think about this one out of here. When you think about the organizational efficiency that some of this stuff in an industry that's been organizationally inefficient for much of the last 20 or 30 years. So you just start going

industry by industry and you begin to wonder who are the benefits really accruing to right now. And look at the strength you're beginning to see. Now it's nascent, but I think it's beginning to happen in some of these consumer stocks, right? Again, the users, not the producers. I have found it notable all year kind of some of the analog summits that frankly outperformed a lot of the traditional ai ones i mean look at the micron numbers today we sit here on oh my god right i mean this is a stock that's already doubled from from where it was a couple months ago we've seen what samsung has has done this year we've seen what hynix has done this year and it's amazing when you meet with like like when you're in korea like sk high and like especially like in asia so many of them it's a memory play i mean i think this is a memory super cycle now i i think the tricky part here is trying to get an understanding of when the bar is being raised too high on the speculative side of the economy. At the same time, when you look at some of the parts of the real economy, whether it's consumer sentiment, that are very, very depressed. It's this very odd environment. I've been saying it's a K-shaped economy. Your area is rock and roll

exciting. And then you talk to people who cover consumer staples, housing, your traditional consumer stuff, and it's depressing. Oh, it's depressing. And you see, I think the UMICH Consumer Sentiment Survey is in the second percentile of the 40-year range or something like that. Now, ironically, that's actually where you should be buying consumer stocks, as silly as that sounds. The excess returns from that conditions are generally pretty good. But it's this very, very bizarre sentiment framework where the speculative fever has been there for much of the year. At the same time, all the real economy stocks, which I think are getting better here, is where sentiment is probably most depressed. We'll come to that. Hi, Steve Eisman here. The most successful businesses in the world share one secret. They know exactly where every dollar goes, what to cut and where to double down. With Ramp, you can see exactly what's happening across the business in real time. RAM combines corporate cards, expense management, bill pay, and travel in one platform. You set spending rules up front, and RAM, corporate cards, block any out-of-policy spend before it even happens. That's why some of the most valuable businesses.

The world like SpaceX, Shopify, Visa, and Stripe cut their expenses by 5% with Ramp. A business owner I really respect uses Ramp, and they say they love it. Invest in your growth. Get on Ramp. New customers get $250 off at Ramp.com slash Eisman. Go to Ramp.com slash Eisman. Ramp.com slash Eisman. Hi, Steve Eisman here. You don't need me to tell you that rent and mortgages are only getting more expensive. That's why Bilt created three credit cards designed to offer the richest rewards on rent, mortgage, and everything else you spend on. Whether you rent or own, you can earn up to 1.25 points on every housing payment without the transaction fee no matter where you live.

Points can be redeemed for flights, hotels, lift rides, a future housing payment, and much more. turn one of the most unavoidable payments in your life into the most rewarding. Find the card that's right for you and apply at joinbuilt.com slash eisman. That's j-o-i-n-b-i-l-t dot com slash eisman. Use our link so they know we sent you. Terms apply. Subject to approval and eligibility, Build cards are issued by Column N.A., member FDIC pursuant to license from MasterCard

I think what people forget is that final six months where I think NASDAQ doubled in the fourth quarter of 99, 10-year yields went from four to almost seven, right? That's a big move. Into the Nikkei peak in 1989, JGB yields went four to eight in 1989. So, I mean, 10-year yields have just gone 390 to 415.

investors going into 26 you're either on especially in tech you're either on this side or this side i'm saying like bull or bear it's a very divisive bull bear debate interesting in

terms of what's happening so let's talk about something divisive tesla okay so so here i have I have no skin in this game, okay? And I never have. I was short to stock years ago, got my head handed to me. But my problem is I just don't trust Elon. I don't trust what he says. I mean, example. He said a couple of conference calls ago that he was going to have 500 autonomous vehicles in Austin. He's got 80. So, you know, the basic business, the electronic vehicle business, that's not doing well. because the credit, all the government subsidies have gone away. That's bad. Robotics is on the come. EV, electronic vehicle, autonomous driving is on the come.

To me, it's all hype. And until I actually see that his robotaxes really work autonomously, I'm on the sidelines. You tell me what you think. so look and obviously like for me you know knowing musk you know from the early days and being such a believer in tech there were so many times where like things like they were a year and a half late 2018 you could argue like you know they were on the verge of like a bankruptcy or pseudo bankruptcy my view is like musk right now is is a wartime ceo like what does that mean what that basically means is that he's so laser focused almost like in a wartime but wartime being the battle versus other attack and you know the competition that he understands that this autonomous chapter robo taxis it's going to be the most important chapter ever in tesla's history and to your but i understand the skepticism but i believe we city are a year from now you're in 30 cities the geofence area significantly expands you're basically at level okay so let me push back imagine that that does not happen that that a year from now or within every time frame that It's important.

We're basically where we are today. What do you think then? Then that would be, I mean, that's like a bear thesis. Like that would be one way. That's the bear thesis. The stock's like a whatever, sub $300 stock, if that happens. I think it's $600 to $800 because they. Because you think it happens. It's binary. That's my target too. And Steve, I think the problem here is you lay out this very elegant reasoning, which may very well be true of why none of this stuff plays out, yet one problem, the chart looks great. And it's probably the best chart of the Mac 7 at this point. So if I'm going to kind of lean on narrative or lean on price action, I'm always going to choose price action.

So the price action is encouraging me to be more imaginative about what could happen over the next year or two years. And whether it's 600 or 800, I'll take either. But I think the direction is higher. Just because of the way the chart looks. Yeah. It is emerging as the leader in Mac 7. And I would just add to your point, like, when it comes to physical AI plays in the world, there's NVIDIA and Tesla. Those are the two best physical AI. What do you mean physical AI? What I'm saying, like, instead of, like, when you talk about just traditional AI, like, software, use cases, LLM, physical AI being, like, robotics, car.

I'm talking about physical, actual AI, and you look at what everything, like, NVIDIA is going after, like, the robotics. Look at Fanuc in Japan. I don't even know what that is. Japanese robotics. I mean, you want to see a pretty chart? Go look at a 20-year chart of Fanuc. This is the real deal. Okay. Human robotics in Japan and in China is ahead of where we are in the U.S. Let's switch. gears for a sec. Let's go to financials for a bit. Tell me what you're thinking. I mean, the charts look great. What are you thinking here? Here's what I'm thinking. And by the way, what's very interesting about just the whole financials group, the banks are great. Insurance looks like- It's getting better. I mean, it ain't great. Payments looks awful. Payments have been terrible for a while. And so it's real. I mean, when people are focusing on financials right now, it's Goldman, it's Morgan Stanley, and maybe some of the, and maybe the regionals, because maybe in this M&A, but tell me what you're hearing.

Goldman Sachs is behaving as the old Goldman Sachs, is certainly what the chart implies. I mean, this has been the leader in financial services now for two years. I want to focus on Bank of America. Okay. Spent 20 years in the confessional booth, right? BAC last... And confessing. And the whole time. Many sins to repent. Many sins. The last high in Bank of America was November of 2006 until this week. This week. November 2006. Until this week. By the way, Citigroup will never get there. Because of the dilution. Because of the dilution. By the way, do you know this? Yeah. The high in Citigroup is like 550.

It's unachievable. In our lifetimes. Never say never, but it's like- And that's because of the dilution. So I want to think about this. For 20 years, these money center banks have had their hands tied behind their back as they repented of the sins of the financial crisis. Yes. I think that's over. We are in a deregulatory regime here. To a degree. I mean, we're not going anywhere close to where – back to where we were in 2006 in terms of the leverage. And maybe nor should we. We should not. But it's – but some of the handcuffs are being taken off. And these companies – by the way, these companies are much, much, much better run than they were.

It's not even a comparison. Let's remember something though. It can't just be a deregulatory story. story because it's happened in Europe. It's happened in Japan. It's happened in LATAM. Find me a bank stock in the world that hasn't made a new 52-week high in the last couple of days. Good luck. You're not going to find any. So there's something global here. It's been the case for two years. It's largely gone unnoticed, unobserved, unembraced. The financials are still very much leadership. Now, talk about some of the laggards within the sector. I actually think insurance might be inflecting back up here. You had Chubb breakout this week. You have AIG acting better, but focus on some of these alternative private capital stocks. You have very deep corrections. Huge.

Huge corrections. In Apollo, in Blackstone. By the way, it's so unusual in a bull market for these companies like Blackstone and Apollo to be down on year. They're down 10%, 15% on the year. After an incredible run. And have to be down even more. Now, I think from peak to trough, they might be down 30% or 40%. Those are pretty deep corrections for stocks and long-term uptrends. So if you wanted to kind of poke around and say what could be a surprise next year relative to consensus, I mean, people got very bearish on these names in that October, November growth scare. Remember all the credit concerns?

Tricolor, first brand. Jeffries. Yes. People got very, very – But by the way, Jeff, people got so hysterical. I got calls over one of those weekends that Jeffries was filing for bankruptcy. It was crazy. The irony here is Steve is probably partly to blame that everyone in this business thinks anything idiosyncratic has the potential of being systemic. Oh, people want to predict the end of the world. Most things remain – By the way, I have a joke about that. The problem is that there's so many people in this world who want to be me. Yeah. And you know what? The position is taken. Yeah, the position.

There's only one. There's only one. And you know what? I'm not interested in predicting the end of the world anymore because believe me, it was no fun the first time around. Yeah. Oh, my God. But you look at these global financials and you know what's remarkable? Wells Fargo, which is often considered like the weakest of them, actually made new highs before most of them a year ago, right? Goldman and Morgan Stanley two years ago made new highs. Bank of America finally in on the act. This is a $55 stock today. I don't think it's a $55 stock next year. What is? BAC, I think. BAC, are you thinking?

I think 75 is a conservative target. Interesting. We could get more aggressive if we wanted to. You know, people got really down on Brian Moynihan and they forgot. I mean, he was handed from Ken Lewis, like, disaster. I mean, he needs to be admired to a degree that he actually fixed the company. What he's done is amazing. And guys, don't sleep on these regionals as well. I mean, curves – So let's talk about the regionals. I've had this thesis for a while. People thought I was crazy at the beginning of the year, which is we have not had a bank M&A wave in this country since the 90s. I know. And it's been completely discouraged by the regulators.

And it's actually, I've actually, I completely changed my mind about this about a year and a half ago, two years ago, that we actually need a bank M&A wave because it can't be that only J.P. Oregon and Wells Fargo are going to be able to afford all the tech. You got to merge these banks and make them larger so they can afford to compete. And this administration, I think, is on board with that. And the fact that Comerica finally put its shareholders out of its misery is an indication, I think, what could potentially happen. So I think if you want a surprise for next year, I mean, for two years, it's been the money centers over the regionals. I would entertain the idea that 26 is more about regionals over money-centered banks in terms of where the leadership is found in an otherwise very healthy banking system. You mentioned Comerica. I mean, this is just finally getting back to highs that haven't been seen in 25 or 30 years.

If that. If that. I mean, I think about PNC just broke out. Regions just broke out. I mean, there's a lot of these. Steeper curve probably helps. You quietly have seen the 230 curve go right back to the highs here. To me, that's a pretty constructive backdrop for these regional banks. Hi, Steve Eisman here. The best pieces in your closet are the ones you can count on, whether you're heading to work, going out, or keeping things casual. And this time of year, Quince makes finding something great for everyone else just as easy. This holiday season, it's where I'm shopping for myself and everyone on my list.

Quince focuses on high-quality staples made with premium materials like 100% Mongolian cashmere. Their cashmere sweaters start at just $60, and the lineups don't stop there. premium down jackets, wool outerwear, and cashmere accessories, everything you and your loved ones need to stay warm and look put together all season long. Everything at Quince is priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen, so you can give luxury quality pieces without the luxury price tag. In the spring, I bought a terrycloth hoodie from Quince, and I love it. Now that it's getting colder, I bought a cashmere sweater hoodie, and I love that too. I wear my new hoodie almost every day. Give the gift of quality this holiday season. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers or go to quince.com.

Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK too. And when Quince asks where you heard about them, let them know it was the real Eisman playbook. It's the best way to support the show. Hi, Steve Eisman here. The most successful businesses in the world share one secret. They know exactly where every dollar goes, what to cut, and where to double down. With Ramp, you can see exactly what's... happening across the business in real time. RAM combines corporate cards, expense management, bill pay, and travel in one platform. You set spending rules up front, and RAMP corporate cards block any out-of-policy spend before it even happens.

That's why some of the most valuable businesses in the world like SpaceX, Shopify, Visa, and Stripe cut their expenses by 5% with RAMP. A business owner I really respect uses RAMP, and they say they love it. Invest in your growth. Get on Ramp. New customers get $250 off at ramp.com slash eisman. Go to ramp.com slash eisman. Ramp.com slash eisman. So let's talk about within everything you do, let's talk about what stuff that you do

what do you you know i gave it i gave him see like my like in my first and yeah when you have like morning meetings or whatever it would be like tech and then some of the other like you know it's like because just from a from a you know interest perspective you have investors that are like real estate investors REITs and now they're like well maybe i could kind of focus on some of these like quasi sort of like tech related REITs so what's been left for dead this year It's just a review.

Like what's – we focus on what's done well. Anything defensive. Let's focus on what's done poorly. Anything defensive. Don't give me a list. Left for dead. So if we're talking about consumer staples as an example here, I would encourage people to start paying attention to Coke here, quietly acting better. Hershey's is quietly acting better. I mean Estée Lauder's probably turned here in a very meaningful way. Maybe they're trying to read on that name. But staples roundly have been left for dead. Am I ready to say that they're going to be your leadership next year? I'm skeptical of that, but listen, I know I don't know.

I want to be open to where the prices and the markets take me. Price action. I certainly don't think that would be impossible, particularly into a midterm election year where you have tended to see a defensive leadership fabric anyway. So I'm alert to that for next year. I'd say the other place kind of left for dead and we hinted at it is some of these private capital, private credit stocks, the Apollos, the Owls, the Blackstones, which, I mean, they were incredible for so many years prior. They had a bad 2025. I wonder if that's past it at this point. Well, my view on that is, first of all, the two sort of what people are calling canaries in the coal mine, which are tricolor and first brands, actually did not originate in private credit.

Those are public credits. But they're viewed as like, you know, what could happen? I actually think that, I mean, for those who are negative on private credit, the simple argument was that in 2020, private credit was $2 trillion, and today it's $3 trillion. So that's a lot of trillion. It's a trillion. And if you want to make an argument that there's bad stuff in there, you can make that argument. The problem is that you have actually no data to back it up, because it's not like pre-great financial crisis, you could look at the monthly securitization data, you could see what was happening. Here, there's no information. So it's pure conjecture.

My view is that whatever has happened in private credit is not going to cause a recession, but that when there is a recession, whoever made mistakes is going to get shown. But I don't see at this point a recession on the horizon. So I don't see what the issue is. I mean, I think if anything, the market seems okay with the idea that we're through a soft patch. right so there was a confident hit in the spring around the tariffs it showed up in weak data in 3q and 4q i think the market's anticipatory of an economic turn here i think the discretionary stocks are suggestive of that i think the commodities are i think the transports all these real economy signals might say hey the the risk in 26 is right tail risk not not left and i think what we were talking about for two is like what's amazing is like i can never remember a market where narrative changes could be so dramatic week to week like that's the one thing that's like crazy about this market you could the narrative changes so quick I was traveling basically like you, basically since Labor Day until last week, right?

And in October and November, going from Jefferies to First Brands to you had that day where Trump set the tweet about the Chinese and the market was down 3% from that. And then Sunday, B.C. I didn't mean it. Remember, Friday, after some golf Sunday, I'm good to go. To the NVIDIA reversal day on the earnings in November, watching in real time, being on the road, watching sentiment erode. And what gets revealed is how fragile sentiment still is. And it doesn't take a lot to shake the tree. We were down 5% on November 20th from the highs. And the narrative was suddenly, oh, my God, the Fed's going to skip the December meeting.

The economy is much weaker than we think. Think how quickly the narrative shift. It's wild. Basically, on that point, I agree the economy is probably better than people think. And I don't think the Fed's going to be so quick to cut. But then again, we don't know who the next Fed chairman is going to be. We don't. Listen, the two-year yield, I've joked and I've – sometimes this joke gets laughed, sometimes it doesn't. But who needs Fed speakers when you have the two-year yield, right? And what's the two-year yield? 346. Right. Where it's been for five months, somewhere between 340 and 360. That's probably where the market believes the neutral rate should be.

Whether that's two cuts next year or one cut next year, I don't think it's terribly different. Getting to that point. So that means that at most over the next year or two, there's two Fed cuts. That's not the narrative of the market. It can't be because if – Do you remember how many cuts were priced when we started this year? No. Six. Six. How many did we get? Three, right? If you told anyone in January, hey, you're not getting six cuts, Dan. You're only getting three. Oh, my God. S&P is going to be down 20%. So that comes to my point. I actually think that because the Fed is not in an aggressive cutting mode, people's sort of hyper-focus on it is kind of a waste of time.

That what's happening in your world is what's important. If the AI keeps going, it'll be fine. Think how quickly, like, if you even go back, like, you have the Oracle, whatever, Blue Owl pulling out, Data Center, Michigan, whatever it is. Then all of a sudden, Mike Brown reports, like, it's like, okay. One day later. It's almost like Ted Stryker flying the airplane, like, everything's fine. You know, and I think that's the thing. It's just. It's like you see the nervousness of some of the trades. But it just continues to be like you have $3 trillion to $4 trillion being spent the next two or three years.

You're in a fourth industrial revolution that we happen to be living in. To have a view that this is an AI bubble, we're just in the early days of the demand cycle. What do you make of the view? I've thought about this. I'm curious your take that if you go back to the 99-2000 experience, the gains in productivity didn't really show up in the data until after the NASDAQ had peaked. Do you think about that today? I mean, I view it as like the use cases are all starting to get deployed in enterprise, in consumer. And I actually think this is one where like we're still in the software use case phase.

So my view is like we don't – it's a tech bull market for, in my view, at least another two years. So I don't think we even hit – so rubber hits the road for another few years because you're not really even going to see – the monetization is going to be much bigger than I think the stocks are factoring in next year. Let's focus on that for a second. So you've got chat GPT, you've got Anthropic, you've got Gemini, you've got perplexity. It reminds me a little bit of the railroads. You don't need so many railroads. I mean, what do you think there could be maybe a shakeout in the sense that you don't need four, five, six massive LLM models.

You maybe need only two or three. And then that means that let's say I'll just throw out OpenAI. Maybe OpenAI falls by the wayside in their ramifications. What do you think about that? I think it's a winner. It's a winner takes most market. Right. But not all. So in other words, you'll have much more – you're going to have the top three or four models that continue to be – but you even see like meta, llama, like that's starting to sort of dissipate. But look, to me, the AI story is not about the models. It's about the data and it's about – I want – models are going to get cheaper and cheaper. the AI trade is about the data and the use case build-out of what that looks like.

So what would be your top three on that theme alone? I mean, on that theme, I mean, to me, it's like you have to own Google, not just because of where I see Gemma, but also because... what's happened on GCP. What's GCP? Google Cloud in terms of like my view, like in the enterprise and the hyperscaller side, how they're benefiting. Right. You know, two, in terms of just what we see on the enterprise, you got to own Microsoft because that's right their backyard in terms of from a hyperscaller perspective. And look, Palantir, I believe, is a trillion dollar market cap in the next two or three years.

I mean, no one has a better mousetrap relative to use cases than Palantir. So let's press out for a second. When you go out and talk to people within the tech community what do they say about palantir and how come and how they compare to let's say mongo db or anybody else out there it's in my whole career i've never seen a company outside used like NVIDIA on chips but just from like an actual like a software perspective that is so on another level of every other company in the whole so what do you like what do you hear from people because the reality is like look palantir even though they did for three letter agencies dod and every so western government for for a decade their technology what is behind sort of you know closed doors cloak and dagger that technology is now going to major corporations and when cios understand what they can do it's it's almost kind of like you know it's game set match type thing and that's why and remember they're doing this without direct sales force they don't ever cut prices and that's palantir basically had a commercial business that went from 20 million to a billion in basically a year and a half i mean that's just the react so that's why when investing it's so expensive most expensive stock ever look it is very expensive

100 but my view is like if you just focus on valuation over the next one two years you miss every transformation or growth stock the last 20 years that's fair i feel like you have to will be able to look at, okay, four to five years, what does the commercial business look like? It's double the margins of the government business. Could earnings go up three, four X from where they are today? Could free cash go from $3 billion to whatever it's going to be, $8 to $10 billion? See, I think those are some of the numbers that you have to go through rather than sometimes just living in a more... So saying what you said about if you focus on valuation, you missed some of...

I think it's a very important statement. Transformational growth names. I mean, you've talked about this. it's like if you just when you look at like apple in 08 after financial crisis oh it's a one-year cycle with at&t why would you Why would you ever leave it black? Why would you ever go away from a BlackBerry? You had to have an understanding what Apple is going to build as a services, as an ecosystem way to monetize it. If you look at NVIDIA 2022, you had to understand the ability, what they could do if they actually came out with an AI chip instead of viewing them as a gaming company. But you wouldn't see that in the numbers over the next year or two.

I just think with the transformational growth stories from Pound to Tesla to many others, if you just look at it over the next 12, 18 months, you miss the longer-term story. Now, look, do you have to be a believer? Do you have to be more valuation agnostic? Yeah. But I'm just saying, like, how many investors that I've known that have had to redo their resume two or three times different hedge funds because they had to stay valuation-centric and couldn't own certain MAG-7 names, they had a short Palantir, whatever it may be? That's why it's good to be a trend follower. It's a blessing. No, but don't – like, we've talked about it.

It's like, don't you think, like, there's certain – like, you can't – You can't get intimidated by stocks in my world that are up two, three, four hundred percent. You can't be intimidated by that. And you also have to identify – Well, you could be intimidated, but you could hold your nose. Well, but at the same time, you have to be very alert to what has had a 50 percent haircut still in the throes of a long-term uptrend, right? That's where you really have to make your money and lean into those. And I think there may be an opportunity in first half or second half of next year kind of in your world to see if we get a good correction here.

What shakes out? Who's in the long-term uptrend? What can we really lean into? I mean, think back to late 2022. I mean, all the MAG7 stocks bottomed exactly where they should, right at the long-term uptrends. There's going to be another moment like that in the next year or two, and you've got to be ready to act. So let's do predictions. What's your prediction for next year?

are going to be up 20% plus. But I think a lot of those could actually be driven by the second, third, fourth derivative as the AI theme plays out. I think in large cap, I think you're going to see like what I think names like Microsoft and Oracle could actually be significant outperformers over next year. And I think the big theme is going to be like Apple is going to get into the AI game with the Gemini partnership. You're seeing new leadership there.

I think Apple as a large cap name could be the one that has like just a massive move because there's no AI. There's no AI component at this point. Because they haven't done. I love the chart. I own it. And now what you're starting to see play out is like new leadership, DOJ win with Google, sets it up for that big Gemini partnership. So that's the one with that installed base. I love it. Would you see? I still say it's the most underweight kind of among the names. I mean by investors. By investors, yeah. Apple. Yeah, because look, Apple, every event I've been at for Apple, I felt like Michael J. Fox Back to the Future, right?

Like it was always kind of like, you know, I mean, where is that? You're at every—Cook's finally been like, clock struck midnight, time to shift their leaders, bring people from the outside. They're not going to do acquisitions, but Apple's ready to play ball. And I think, look, I think the theme is like you said. We're going to have these white knuckle moments. But the reality is like we are early in this tech trade that has – So I completely agree with you other than the two risks that I outlined earlier before. Sure. Energy. If that – the energy is – that's a real risk. No, it is. Because it always takes longer to do stuff than you think.

And the whole LLM thing I think is more serious than you think. I think we should leave it to the states to figure that out. You know, every time I go into a motor vehicle, I feel really comfortable that the states could have control of that. No, I'm joking. But I'm saying the reality is it needs to be a federal roadmap. I agree with that. I mean, would you add one more risk to that? It's just rates. They haven't really moved here, but they've moved in Germany. We know they moved in Japan. I think it would be silly not to be alert to the idea that you get a pretty bad move in rates. I think that's – look, if the economy is stronger than people think in the early part of the year, you could get the 10-year back to four and a half.

Then people start to get nervous and they start to have a whole narrative about, you know, you got to get rid of your speculative stocks. I've seen that. I could read the headlines already. I could see that. Okay, guys. That was really great. Thank you. No, this is so fun. That was fun. Happy New Year to both of you. You too. Happy New Year. Health and health and prosperous. That four. Great. That was great. Have a great one. Thank you. Have a good New Year. We'll talk at the end next year. Thank you. Thank you. this podcast is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice the hosts and guests may hold positions in stocks discussed opinions expressed on their own and not recommendations please do your own due diligence and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions